/ world today news/ In two weeks, Russia becomes a co-founder of the Chinese bank ABII, which many experts perceive as the biggest threat to the American hegemony in the world financial markets, especially since the USA is no longer the first economy in the world – this place was taken by China . Washington got very caught up in the confrontation with Russia, which helped the Chinese to gain from it. /Russian. ez./
In Soviet times, there was a popular joke among the intelligentsia: “The United States brazenly and unceremoniously interferes in the internal affairs of the Soviet Union all over the world.” The USSR disappeared, and the only country left with internal affairs all over the world was the United States itself. They perceive any attempt at their status as a threat to internal stability.
It seems that Washington will have to either abandon this concept or get involved in a confrontation with the entire world under the next president. The situation with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is the most obvious evidence of this.
An unusual role
On March 31, the application period for participation in the authorized capital of the AIIB ended. 52 countries expressed a desire to become co-founders, 31 of which have already received the consent of the Chinese authorities. So far, the only state that has been refused is North Korea – not because of ideological differences or “financing terrorism,” but solely because the DPRK cannot provide detailed information about the state of the country’s economy and financial markets.
Even the Republic of China, better known as Taiwan, has submitted an application. Until relatively recently, the possibility of “main” China invading the island was seriously discussed, and the US flexed its muscles, promising to do everything in its power to protect the “Beautiful Island” from the insidious aggressor. Now, according to the representative of the PRC Foreign Ministry Hua Chunying, Taiwan’s application will be considered in the normal course of business, however, separately from the others – in the context of the principle of “one country – two systems”.
It seems that in the case of the AIIB, the US has found itself in a very unusual role as an international outsider. Even the faithful “poodle” Britain, even Australia, even the Middle Eastern outpost Saudi Arabia – everyone wants a share in the Chinese project.
Japan’s refusal to participate in the AIIB is not following the mainstream of American policy, but an independent position. Tokyo has always perceived Beijing as its main geopolitical adversary; there are unresolved territorial disputes between the countries, and, unlike the Kuril Islands, the conflict over the Senkaku Islands has almost reached armed confrontation several times. Of course, Japan could not enter such a project as a participant.
Russia applied to participate on March 30, and on April 14 it will officially join the founding countries. According to First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov, Moscow’s participation in the project is “a concrete way to improve the physical infrastructure in our country and our partners.” At the same time, he, like official representatives of other AIIB member countries, rejected suggestions that the new bank will become a competitor to the IMF, the World Bank or others. “I am reading a lot of comments on this matter now: that someone is opposing the creation of this bank because they see it as an alternative to the World Bank or an emerging new system that will counter the IMF. We are not studying this agenda. We do not think so, we are not thinking about annoying anyone or creating alternative mechanisms,” he said on the sidelines of the economic forum in China’s Boao.
However, most experts perceive the AIIB as the most serious threat to American hegemony in global financial markets.
China wins
In recent days, articles about the AIIB and the strength of the Chinese economy have appeared in many leading Western media outlets. The article in Newsweek states unequivocally: “China is winning. There is no doubt about it, since most world powers agree with its plans.” “The US looks the weakest in this situation, since its superpower status is being challenged faster than expected. The US is losing influence with its allies, including the usually loyal UK,” states journalist John Elliott.
The Financial Times notes that “the fever over joining the AIIB has embarrassed Washington, which has tried to dissuade applicants by pointing to potential problems with the bank’s governance… and only Japan has heeded Obama’s pleas.” Only, as we have noted, it is not Obama’s pleas that matter, but Japan’s own interests.
“The US thought that there were many more people who supported them in their opposition to the AIIB. They misunderstood the situation,” the publication quotes a Western top manager working in Beijing.
In turn, Reuters publishes an article about how the yuan is already very close to becoming a global reserve currency, and this year. British and German analysts believe this is quite likely, and the Managing Director of the Official Monetary Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF) David Marsh believes that the increasing role of the yuan is a “potential threat to the dollar and its leading position as a global currency.”
Independent writers are even more hawkish. “The pompous course of the Obama administration toward Asia has been shattered by China, which is gathering Washington’s closest allies around its investment bank,” says Wayne Madsen. “The transfer of control over global financial flows from Wall Street and the City to new development banks and funds in Beijing or Shanghai is a fait accompli, leaving behind the United States’ efforts to preserve the existing order,” he writes.
“China is the biggest threat to US hegemony in Europe and the world today. However, the US blindly continues to engage in economic adventurism in Europe, trying to contain the so-called Russian threat, which does not actually exist,” notes Jack Rasmus, a doctor of political science and economics.
Our interest
After any Russian-Chinese agreements, articles about the terrible “Chinese threat” regularly appear in liberal and nationalist media, and this will most likely happen now. They are really hoping for the Chinese in Ukraine, saying that “little yellow men” will come to Primorye and hold a referendum on joining China. Of course, there is no real basis for these “horror stories”, China does not need territorial expansion.
Nevertheless, the change from Pax Americana to Pax Sinae is a phenomenon that we are all witnessing now. The Chinese have their advantages – they do not interfere in the internal politics of partner countries, but they also have their disadvantages, including their readiness to insist on their own vision of the situation for an unlimited amount of time. The Chinese are very tough negotiators, because they can afford it.
In this situation, it is extremely important for Russia not to go to extremes. On the one hand, not to be afraid of the “Chinese threat,” and on the other, not to think that China is some kind uncle who will help us only because we also do not approve of American hegemony.
Once upon a time, Russia blindly believed in the “good West,” and the sobering up was extremely unpleasant and painful.
Therefore, in the case of China, Russia must firmly defend its interests, maneuvering between Beijing and Washington, Beijing and Brussels, Beijing and Delhi, Beijing and Tehran. Just as all states do, determined to peacefully achieve their own goals, and not to forcefully resolve the inevitable problems that arise.
#predict #collapse #Washingtons #financial #influence
