The actress was initially featured in the trailer for the film she produced "Universal images"but in the final version of "yesterday" Telling the story of a musician immersed in a parallel reality in which the Beatles don’t exist, the 30-year-old actress is lost after her scenes are cut in the edit.
That prompted the plaintiffs to file a joint lawsuit on Friday for fraud, according to US media reports.
According to the complaint, "Consumers have not received the expected value of their rent or purchase".
In his defense, he said "Universal images" Movie trailers are protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech.
But the judge assigned to the case on Thursday dismissed that argument, criticizing the huge Hollywood production house.
said the judge, "Basically, a movie trailer is an advertisement designed to sell a movie by giving the consumer an overview" About the long imaginary work. This allowed the legal proceedings to be initiated against the company.
According to the French news agency, the plaintiffs asked V The lawsuit compensation of five million dollars.
Hearings in the case will open on April 3.
“>
When they each spent $3.99, or about $8, to watch a movie,yesterday“on a platform”Amazon PrimeThe two men, one from California and the other from Maryland, thought they were going to see their beloved actress.Na de ArmasShe is best known for her role as a spy in the James Bond film ‘No Time to Day’.
The actress initially appeared in the trailer for the Universal Pictures film, but in the final version of Yesterday, which tells the story of a musician immersed in a parallel reality in which the Beatles do not exist, the 30-year-old is nowhere to be seen after that his scenes were cut in an edit.
That prompted the plaintiffs to file a joint lawsuit on Friday for fraud, according to US media reports.
According to the complaint, “consumers have not received the expected value of their rent or purchase.”
In his defense, he said:Universal imagesMovie trailers are protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech.
But the judge assigned to the case on Thursday rejected that argument, criticizing the huge Hollywood production house.
“Essentially, a movie trailer is an advertisement designed to sell a movie by giving the consumer an overview” of a feature film, Elkady said. This allowed the legal proceedings to be initiated against the company.
According to the French news agency, the plaintiffs asked V The lawsuit compensation of five million dollars.
Hearings in the case will open on April 3.
