There is a lynching campaign against Zaldívar, maintains AMLO

President Andrés Manuel López Obrador maintained that there is a lynching campaign against the former minister-president of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, Arturo Zaldívar, based on an anonymous complaint. To the express question, he referred to alleged pressure from the Executive Branch to the Judicial Branch under the Zaldívar administration. “What is the problem that I meet with the president of the Court and the Attorney General of the Republic to discuss matters of State?”

-Could you use the statements you made about asking Zaldívar for help?

-What is the crime? If it has to do with collaboration between powers when it comes to matters of State. Imagine if we are not going to agree to see the disappearance of the young people of Ayotzinapa. Furthermore, there is a lot of hypocrisy on the part of conservatives.

He recalled that in the Ayotzinapa case there was involvement of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, that is, the now senator Emilio Álvarez Icaza.

López Obrador affirmed that the figure of Zaldívar is being debated based on an anonymous complaint. They gave him speed, prompt and expeditious justice, now it is known that it is a kind of revenge against Minister Zaldívar.

“He has all of our support, backing, confidence. I consider him an integrated lawyer, a former member of the Judiciary who acted with rectitude. That is why I went to his reports because I do not remember that a president of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation who “will talk about the fight against corruption and nepotism, compromises and everything that the decomposition of that power that is almost completely rotten means.”

They are very hypocritical, that is their doctrine. “Where is the problem that I meet to tell you that this is a state matter, of interest to all of us, what really happened to the young people of Ayotzinapa?”

He questioned where the protection came from for members of the executive branch and also the judicial branch that allowed 80 people to obtain their freedom under the assumption that they were tortured.

In fact, some were tortured but not all and those who had participated in the disappearance were released. I have all the evidence, and whoever makes the resolution is in the judiciary, but with the advice of human rights specialists from the IACHR. .