Home » News » Thepthai Senphong Discusses Political Debates under Section 152 and Section 151

Thepthai Senphong Discusses Political Debates under Section 152 and Section 151

Mr. Thepthai Senphong, former MP for Nakhon Si Thammarat, posted on Facebook, Thepthai Senphong – Talking about Politics, stating that he did not expect a laundering. Just practicing the debate on Section 152, waiting for the actual debate on Section 151.

Opening a debate to interrogate the government of the opposition party according to Section 152 of the Constitution. I didn’t expect much from this debate. Because it is a general discussion without voting. which has no political stakes This is different from the debate under Section 151, where there is also a vote of no confidence in the minister being questioned. Therefore, the debate has stakes. There is political gain. The opposition must bring out strong evidence. Or let’s show the receipt. to overthrow the government

But the discussion under Section 152 is compared to the world boxing championship. It can be considered a fight outside the round. There is no world championship belt at stake. Or if it’s a football competition. It was a kick outside the round. It has no effect on the trophy competition. Therefore making this debate not as interesting as it should be. It is only a discussion to exercise rights before the close of the parliamentary session. And the opposition will probably collect strong evidence. It is better to use it in voting discussions under Section 151 in the next meeting.

As for the discussion point, if I were to speculate on the exam, I think there is probably a main issue of non-compliance with government policy. Regarding the policy for distributing digital wallet money Double standard treatment of the justice process Failure in drug suppression 5 amphetamine pills policy Liberal cannabis policy Problems with gambling dens all over the house Tribute problems in the Royal Thai Police, etc.

As for the discussion atmosphere Even though the government has announced that they will not establish a bodyguard. But in reality There will be people protesting. disrupt discussion When there is a reference to Mr. Thaksin This is a right that the opposition can discuss. Even if you are an outsider But if it is related to the issues that need to be discussed And it is the right of third parties to use their rights to sue. If you think you have received damage which the debaters are ready to take responsibility for

Therefore, we do not want to cause protests that spoil the atmosphere. and protested until the debaters were unable to debate Just like the past several meetings. When there was a discussion, Mr. Thaksin’s name was mentioned. will be protested immediately The chairman of the meeting must control and decide to be the norm because there will be some MPs protesting in order to show their form to please the boss. Just like when Mr. Thaksin was Prime Minister, if any MPs rose up to protest. There will be points awarded to protesters every time. These days are no different. There will be some MPs playing the role of protesters. Work to meet the eyes of the boss. The most influential person in the Pheu Thai Party

I recommend that the opposition use this forum for questioning. It’s preparation. Practice discussion skills Keep cool evidence first. To wait for the end of the war in the debate for a vote of no confidence according to Section 151

2024-04-02 07:52:00
#Thepthai #advises #opposition #strong #evidence #Waiting #debate #pass #vote #confidence #Section #Online #Manager

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.