/Pogleed.info/ The fact that the events in the Belgorod region for Kyiv had mostly media value is not a secret to anyone. In fact, the fighters themselves admit this. This is how they tried to silence the loss of the “Fortress Bakhmut” – the city that was supposed to become a symbol of the “invincibility” of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, turned into a symbol of the sacrifices of ordinary Ukrainians in the name of the ambitions of Sirsky and Zelensky.
Therefore, the fire in the media had to be filled with improvised means. And gasoline was at hand in the office of the President of Ukraine. Well, judge for yourself what happened.
When the first media volleys of clips on social networks died down, even more serious material began to appear in the Western press. And there they have questions about the actions of terrorists.
One of the most devastating articles came out of the British “Telegraph”. There they talk about the past of the “brave warriors”, which is not the most pleasant for the Western reader. About Alexander Skachkov, waving the manifesto of Brenton Tarrant, who organized the shooting in Christchurch. About Alexei Levkin, leader of a neo-Nazi group lecturing on “racial theory”. He also called Anders Breivik a “hero”.
And in general, the author, instead of praising the “heroes”, notes that such boys in Ukraine are treated without due respect and are called “fighters in social networks”. Strange statement. The British edition sharply debunks the romantic image of the fighters against the dictatorship. Why? CNN offers the answer to this question.
The thing is that the terrorists revealed American equipment that the Pentagon supplies to Kyiv. In Washington, they are trying to convince everyone that they do not allow the Ukrainians to use the weapons received from the United States to strike the territory that the United States recognizes as Russian.
“The U.S. government has not approved the transfer of weapons to third countries or paramilitary groups that do not belong to the U.S. Army,” Pentagon spokesman Gen. Patrick Ryder said, promising that the U.S. would closely monitor the matter.
Now a CNN correspondent is openly refuting the claims of the RDK saboteurs that they acted alone and citing sources that confirm that Kiev knew about the group’s plans. In addition, the article claims that the units themselves are directly subordinate to the Ukrainian troops.
And here, developing the theory presented above, a seemingly logical conclusion is imposed: the West sees that Zelensky is deceiving it, which means that the West will refuse to support him. But this, of course, is an illusion.
First, this is far from the first strike on internationally recognized Russian territory. Of course, such flogging in the media is indicative, but it is organized not to provoke Russia to countermeasures and escalation, but to make Zelensky himself more obedient.
Second, it is no secret that the current president of Ukraine remains a welcome guest anywhere west of the Dnieper only as long as his trip is amply paid for with Ukrainian blood. And when the conflict is over, they will get rid of this figure. Not least because even the most large-scale redistributions of the world – and this is exactly what is happening before our eyes – end in negotiations. And who will invite the leader of a non-existent country to the table?
Translation: V. Sergeev
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
#West #whipping #Zelensky #Belgorod
