Whoopi Goldberg’s Wild claims: Musk, vance, and a Presidential Conspiracy?
The recent election cycle has seen its share of unusual defenses, from the infamous “Twinkie Defense” used in the Dan White trial to a more recent “Knucklehead Defense” employed by a political candidate. now, a new contender emerges: the “Whiskers Defense,” courtesy of Whoopi Goldberg.
Goldberg,known for her outspoken views and sometimes controversial statements on “The View,” has onc again ignited a firestorm. Her latest theory centers on President-elect trump’s incoming governance, specifically alleging an unlikely alliance between Elon Musk and Vice President-elect J.D.Vance.
Goldberg’s previous pronouncements, including claims that Donald Trump would “forcibly separate interracial couples” and become a dictator immediately upon taking office, have been widely criticized as unfounded and misleading. This latest assertion,though,takes a different,even more startling turn.
During a recent episode of “The View,” Goldberg and her co-hosts engaged in a discussion that veered into highly speculative territory.Joy Behar suggested that Musk is secretly orchestrating the presidency, with Vance’s complicity. Goldberg echoed this sentiment,stating,”I’ve called him vice president. I’ve called him president because I don’t know what J.D. is doing.I hardly ever — I don’t remember the last time we even talked about J.D.”
Sunny Hostin agreed with Goldberg’s assessment, adding to the already heated discussion. Behar further fueled the speculation by stating, “He’s planning the presidency when they get rid of Trump.”
The conversation culminated in Goldberg’s alarming statement: “So, you think it’s Musk/Vance?,” to which Behar replied, “Possible.” This exchange,captured by NewsBusters,has sparked widespread debate and criticism.
Goldberg’s comments didn’t stop there. She issued a seemingly unrelated warning, stating, “Hey, [Trump], stay away from the stairways. Because, you know, people put their leg out to trip you going down the stairs. Watch out,” This bizarre statement, followed by a later, somewhat apologetic clarification (“okay, I need to clean something up because my cat lays in wait for me on my stairs all the…”), only served to further amplify the controversy.
The incident highlights the increasingly polarized political climate and the role of prominent figures in shaping public discourse. While Goldberg’s comments are undoubtedly controversial, they underscore the need for critical thinking and responsible media consumption in an era of rampant misinformation.
The implications of such unsubstantiated claims extend beyond mere entertainment. The spread of misinformation can have serious consequences, impacting public trust and potentially influencing political outcomes. The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of verifying data from reliable sources before accepting it as truth.
Related: whoopi’s Decree Would Mean the End of ’The View’
Source: NewsBusters
Video: Whoopi Goldberg’s previous comments on Donald Trump
The View Faces Potential Legal reckoning After Controversial Trump Remarks
The daytime talk show, “The View,” is facing potential legal repercussions following a series of controversial comments made by its hosts regarding President-elect Trump. The show’s history of inflammatory rhetoric and recent high-profile settlements involving ABC News have raised concerns about the potential for further legal action.
One particularly contentious segment saw a host attempt to explain away a potentially damaging statement. “I wasn’t trying to indicate that they were actually standing there with their legs out hoping he would trip,” she claimed, clarifying a previous remark. This incident, though, is just the latest in a string of controversial statements made by the show’s hosts.
Unlike many news programs, “The View” frequently finds itself needing to issue corrections and clarifications.The show’s outspoken nature has even led to suggestions that family members should be excluded from holiday gatherings based on their political affiliations. “Most news shows don’t have to correct the record over and over,” one media analyst noted. “Not every news show suggests family members ban loved ones from their holiday meals if they voted the ‘wrong’ way,either.”
A Pattern of Inflammatory Rhetoric
Earlier this month, the hosts faced criticism after reading what were described as “legal notes” following their harsh criticism of individuals associated with the incoming Trump administration. This incident, though, is far from an isolated case. “The View’s” unprofessional, unhinged rhetoric isn’t new, and the show’s history of controversial statements is well-documented.
What is new is the President-elect’s increasingly firm response to such attacks. ABC news recently settled a lawsuit with Trump for a reported $16 million after its morning news anchor falsely claimed multiple times that Trump had been found liable for rape. “It’s a lie, and ABC News paid dearly for it,” stated a source close to the Trump legal team.
The Trump legal team is also pursuing legal action against an Iowa pollster whose last-minute survey was substantially inaccurate, missing the mark by a staggering 16 points. This aggressive approach suggests that the President-elect is prepared to pursue legal action against those he perceives as spreading misinformation or engaging in defamatory attacks. The lawsuit against the Iowa pollster serves as a stark warning.
Given the escalating legal battles and the potential for further lawsuits, “The View” may find itself facing meaningful legal challenges if it continues its current trajectory. The show’s future, and the future of its hosts, hangs in the balance.
