The lawyer reported that “an alleged witness has been summoned” of which they did not find its connection to the cause or its proposal. Furthermore, regarding this, Leyenda points out as a serious error that “it does not determine the schedule of the testimonial hearing” and requests that the summons made be declared null and void, inadmissible or erroneous.
Also, the lawyer highlights that, on the day of the summons to the alleged witness, the victim/survivor must be present at the Psychiatric Expert in the La Matanza Consultancy.
The victim’s testimony
The complaint against Gonzalo Montiel
The defense lawyer requested a series of items in pursuit of this summons: that the witness be summoned again on a future date indicating the time, that her connection to the witness’s case, her proposition and relevance be indicated and that Montiel be summoned to psychological and psychiatric experts as the victim has suffered.
Furthermore, he requested that the cover of the file is modified identifying the case with the name of the Argentine world champion and “not the name of an alleged defendant indicated by the first to mask his crime” making reference to ‘Acosta’, an individual that the defense of the former River indicated as the author of the aberrant act .
