If the authorized framework doesn’t match their worldview, the progressive courts transcend this and make selections that make it much more apparent that they made a political choice. , mentioned Péter Törcsi, govt director of the AK. They usually severely punished somebody who doesn’t settle for the triple package deal of battle, migration, intercourse or a part of it, he mentioned.
The EUJ is just not an impartial court docket, however a political physique, he emphasised.
One of many predominant pillars of the choice that criticizes Hungary is a Cypriot choose – defined Miklós Kobza. He wrote a research on how environmental NGOs affect the Court docket of Justice of the European Union, and that this apply is just not but widespread in Cyprus, however must be growing now. What does this seem like in apply? he requested a query.
As an instance that Péter Törcsi and I are each traders, opponents of one another, as a result of we work in the identical business. Peter plans to implement a brand new funding close to Budapest. Alternatively, I don’t need a competitor subsequent to the Hungarian capital. That’s the reason I’m beginning to fund an “impartial”, “civil” group to problem the choice, which has gone via all of the places of work, within the Court docket of the European Union . And since such teams can affect the choices of the court docket, it’s doable that I’ll harm my competitor, that I can minimize down the entire plan.
Miklós Kobza defined.
