Alfredo Jalife-Rahme
A quote from CIA Director William Burns, 67, says it all: “China’s growing military and economic strength, Russia’s willingness to use military force in Ukraine, and a growing number of regional powers pursuing foreign policies.” independent have led to a world of intense strategic competition in which the US no longer enjoys undisputed primacy (https://fam.ag/3OzOb2u)”.
Today we are far from the book from 27 years ago by the Russophobe Brzezinski: The great chessboard: the primacy (sic) of the United States and its geostrategic imperatives. Burns is the last diplomatic
that remains in the United States, without counting the heights of George Kennan, whose footprints he wanted to imitate in Moscow.
No one from the Khazarian triplet (https://bit.ly/3QqemJr) reaches the levels diplomats
Burns: nor Biden’s National Security Advisor, Jacob Sullivan – who made a fool of himself in an article from the same Foreign Affairs that he ordered deleted when he bellowed that Gaza (sic) was in better conditions than ever (https://bit.ly/3MkeFE5)– neither the very mediocre Antony Blinken, nor the pugnacious Vicky Nuland of the Kagan family sect (https://bit.ly/3OGeBin).
Burns confesses that While Russia is the most immediate challenge, China is the biggest long-term threat.
which is why the CIA has dedicated itself in the past two years to reorganize to reflect such priority
. Burns contributes nothing and reiterates the rehashes of the competitiveness
not to say hostility, of the US towards the new alliance unlimited
clearly complementary, of Russia/China to which I have referred since 2019 ( y https://bit.ly/3HNhfzU). Now Burns goes from his excellent 32-year career in the foreign service to his new assignment as apprentice sorcerer as the top US spy, where he has the personal marking of the deputy director of the CIA, David Samuel Cohen, who rose from undersecretary in the Department of the US Treasury in charge of financial espionage and the supposed fight against terrorism (of enemies rather than friends) and who allegedly shares their data with the Mossad.
Burns’s essay is very boring and cannot hide his pathological Russophobia or his surreptitious flirtation with China – perhaps in order to try to fracture the core of the G-2 between Russia and China that has brought about the joint polycentric multipolar emergence of the BRICS plus and of OPEC plus.
Perhaps its best contribution lies in what is well-known about the technological revolution that is more overwhelming than the industrial revolution or the beginning of the nuclear age
when since the microchips to artificial intelligence to quantum computing emerging technologies transform the world, including the profession (sic) of espionage
.
By the way, in nuclear matters and in postmodern weapons, such as hypersonic missiles, Russia has ousted the United States (https://bit.ly/3Svs3b1), while China takes a generation advantage in artificial intelligence to the US (https://bit.ly/42taz3m). Where only the US prevails is with the quantum computing
.
Beyond your insipid essay, I detect four redeemable points: 1) for its own survival, the US must continue supporting the losers heroes
of the Khazarian comedian Zelensky in order to contain and/or bleed and/or balkanize Russia; 2) Biden’s support for Ukraine is reflected in the Taiwan dispute so that China learns that it does not have a clear path to recover its renegade province, in accordance with the negotiations with the two duos of Nixon/Kissinger and Carter/Brzezinski ; 3) the volatile bipolar game of medium powers
and 4) he does not even touch Iran with a rose petal, when Burns was the conceptual architect of the arrangement of the Obama/Biden duo with the Shiite theocracy of Tehran that Trump trampled.
I recommend Burns read two books almost 248 years apart: The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (https://amzn.to/4buwc7O), by Edward Gibbon, and The Defeat of the West, by Emmanuel Todd (https://bit.ly/3w9LwGI).
The Conference