The two crimes of killing Naira and Salma in Egypt.. 3 similarities

<div id="firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type="article" data-bind-html-compile="article.body" data-first-article-body="

The similarity also appears in several other matters, including the congruence in the chronology between the occurrence of the crime and the referral of the accused to an urgent trial.

Occurred a crime Naira Ashraf was killed in the street in front of Mansoura University by her colleague Muhammad Adel, who stabbed and slaughtered her with a knife he had prepared in advance to commit the crime. That was on Monday, June 20. The accused was referred to the urgent criminal trial on Wednesday, June 22, just 48 hours after the crime.

There was a murder Salma Bahjat On the street, at the entrance to a real estate, by her colleague Islam Muhammad, who stabbed her 17 times with a knife he had prepared in advance to carry out his crime, on Tuesday 9 August, and on Thursday 11 August, the Public Prosecution decided to refer the accused to an urgent criminal trial, i.e. 48 hours also after committing the crime.

Among the similarities and even congruence, that Accused By killing Naira he confessed to killing her because she refused to marry him, which is what Salma Bahjat’s killer admitted.

What is also interesting is that the two cases coincided in their scenes in terms of the families of each victim warning the accused of exposure to them shortly before the crime, as revealed by the investigations.

In addition to that, the person accused of killing Naira learned about her route and the dates of her movement from one of her friends, so she followed her and monitored her and committed his crime.

The two cases were similar in causing panic and anger in the hearts of the followers, as well as the similarity in that the people were the ones who arrested the accused in the two crimes until they were handed over to the police.

In addition to all this, the defendants confessed to the two crimes and admitted that they deliberately committed the two incidents as punishment for the victims for their refusal to love the defendants, and handed them over while awaiting the death penalty.

It should be noted that the Egyptian Public Prosecutor’s decision, issued Thursday evening, to refer a peaceful killer to urgent trial, charged him with premeditated murder.

malicious intent

Investigations by the Public Prosecution revealed that the accused of killing Salma "She made the intention and determined to take her soul after her and her family rejected her betrothal to him; As he threatened her and some of her relatives to kill her if they continued to refuse, and for ignoring his threats and banning him from communicating with them by any means.".

Investigations revealed that the accused" He defrauded one of the victim’s girlfriends until he knew the date of her meeting with her in a property in Zagazig, so he chose him as a date to kill her, and on that day he preceded her to the property and bought a knife from a nearby store, and he stalked the victim at the entrance to the property until she came, so he stabbed her with a knife, until he killed her.".

The Public Prosecution said that it" It established evidence against the accused from the testimony of 15 witnesses, and what was proven by the forensic reports of the victim’s body, and the examination of the phones of the accused, the victim, and her friend, and the digital evidence that indicated that the accused had committed the crime and attributed it to him.

“>

The similarity also appears in several other matters, including the congruence in the chronology between the occurrence of the crime and the referral of the accused to an urgent trial.

Occurred a crime Naira Ashraf was killed in the street in front of Mansoura University by her colleague Muhammad Adel, who stabbed and slaughtered her with a knife he had prepared in advance to commit the crime. That was on Monday, June 20. The accused was referred to the urgent criminal trial on Wednesday, June 22, just 48 hours after the crime.

There was a murder Salma Bahjat On the street, at the entrance to a real estate, by her colleague Islam Muhammad, who stabbed her 17 times with a knife he had prepared in advance to carry out his crime, on Tuesday 9 August, and on Thursday 11 August, the Public Prosecution decided to refer the accused to an urgent criminal trial, i.e. 48 hours also after committing the crime.

Among the similarities and even congruence, that Accused By killing Naira he confessed to killing her because she refused to marry him, which is what Salma Bahjat’s killer admitted.

What is also interesting is that the two cases coincided in their scenes in terms of the families of each victim warning the accused of exposure to them shortly before the crime, as revealed by the investigations.

In addition to that, the person accused of killing Naira learned about her route and the dates of her movement from one of her friends, so she followed her and monitored her and committed his crime.

The two cases were similar in causing panic and anger in the hearts of the followers, as well as the similarity in that the people were the ones who arrested the accused in the two crimes until they were handed over to the police.

In addition to all this, the defendants confessed to the two crimes and admitted that they deliberately committed the two incidents as punishment for the victims for their refusal to love the defendants, and handed them over while awaiting the death penalty.

It should be noted that the Egyptian Public Prosecutor’s decision, issued Thursday evening, to refer a peaceful killer to urgent trial, charged him with premeditated murder.

malicious intent

The investigations of the Public Prosecution revealed that the accused of killing Salma “has the intention and resolve to take her soul after her and her family’s rejection of her betrothed to him, as he threatened to kill her and some of her relatives if their refusal continued, and for ignoring his threats and banning him from communicating with them by any means.”

Investigations revealed that the accused “defrauded one of the victim’s girlfriends until he knew the date of her meeting with her in a property in Zagazig, so he chose him as a date to kill her. “.

The Public Prosecution said that it “established evidence against the accused from the testimony of 15 witnesses, and what was proven by the forensic reports of the victim’s body, and the examination of the phones of the accused, the victim and her friend, and the digital evidence found in it indicating that the accused committed the crime and attributing it to him.”

–