After all, did the player sign for Oberliga MSV Düsseldorf in July?
It is in fact a case that is becoming increasingly difficult to complete: the transfer story on the 19-year-old Frenchman Moise Gae and the question if he before signing the Viktoria Arnoldsweiler, Middle Rhine League team already have a contract with Lower Rhine Oberliga Club MSV Düsseldorf he signed.
Tuesday had West German Football Association sent an intentional decision to the persons involved in the proceedings, in which the WDFV Youth Sports Court, here competent for the age of the player, announced that it would cancel the contract with the Düsseldorf team under sporting law and also considered which the club should refuse due to incorrect information in the application for eligibility to play with a fine of 300 euros. However, MSV was given a 48 hour period to finally comment on the trial (we reported here).
There are now signs of a turnaround that the sports field apparently wasn’t really expecting when it explained it. Because in this period the club is now presenting the contract with the player, of which Moise Gaes had repeatedly stressed that he had never seen him. The contract is also available for FuPa and bears the player’s signature. Additionally, MSV Düsseldorf has now also filed an affidavit from the three witnesses who are said to be present when the signing was supposed to take place at 7pm on July 21st. Of course, in the meantime the picture has changed, because even if the contract is dated July 26 and is said to have been signed on July 21, it is obviously conceivable that it was only dated the day the documents were presented.
“Now he’s lying to us blatantly”
Now the club president of MSV Düsseldorf, Noureddin Mahnin, also on record that the contract was with the WDFV in Duisburg from 26 July. “We are described as liars here, but we certainly didn’t lie. Mr. Moise Gae signed with us and it’s a fact. I spoke to him personally in English and French. And now he’s lying to us blatantly,” Mahnin points out, who in he had previously stressed that MSV Düsseldorf would also be happy to pay for a possible graphological report out of his own pocket.
Although contradictions remain, there has been talk of two witnesses on July 26 and now of three witnesses on July 21, but now the tide seems to be turning. We do not want to get stuck in the role of the sports court, even if it is still incomprehensible why the MSV did not present the documents before and thus avoided a long sports judicial proceeding and unfavorable complaints.
