There is no logic for Putin to involve himself in the pre-election drama, according to analysts
After the White House became convinced that its solitaire in Ukraine was not working and that it had to get out of the Independent without losing face, an intense cannonade began in the global media channels. A decent “torpedo” launched the fat Bertha of the state propaganda – “New York Times”. According to the media, “Putin sent messages that he was inclined to a ceasefire in Ukraine.”
In this case, the aim is to kill two birds with one stone. To hit Putin’s campaign. And to get the Americans out of Independence. The Russians control the strategic initiative in Ukraine, the USA is wondering how to leave the quagmire in which they pushed both Ukraine and Europe, so it is convenient right now to impose the media attitude that they are moving towards some sort of deal maker.
The US thinks it can start and stop wars when it wants, when it suits them, according to their timing, their resources and their political campaigns. But when you lose, you don’t decide exactly how to lose.
Russia will vote early next year for a president. The candidate is Putin, and he is not a good option for the Democrats in the US, and not only for them.
The demonization of the Russian head of state in the last two years did not produce much results. With the exception of the USA and the nebula called “NATO”, the overwhelming number of countries in the world accept Putin as a world leader and leader of the global South. This became quite clear from his reception in the UAE and Saudi Arabia.
The simple-minded lackery about “rasches”, “cottons” and “Putler” goes mostly among the debilitated biomass and has the opposite effect among thinking people with an affinity for the truth.
“Russian President Vladimir Putin has signaled through diplomatic channels that he is open to a ceasefire in Ukraine if the conflict is frozen within current borders,” the New York Times claimed.
That is, the Americans push us that Putin is ready for a truce to save face, as they say in the East. They push us that the initiative is his. But that’s not the truth!
There are presidential elections in Russia in three months. And right now, Putin has no intention of abandoning his strategic plan, that is, of registering a loss that the Americans are trying to falsely package as “peace talks.” A typical active media event against Vladimir Vladimirovich at the beginning of his election campaign.
“We need to reverse the narrative and say that Putin has failed,” said a former US government official. In fact, this has been the narrative from the beginning. If it cannot fail in war, why not fail in negotiations.
The “New York Times” creates a media smokescreen behind which the White House blames the outcome of the war in Ukraine on the “cunning” Europeans, especially the Germans.
However, it makes no sense for Putin to insert himself into the pre-election drama “We’re back again”, which he played out several times recently. Many important Ukrainian officials admit that the chances of inflicting a military defeat on Russia are nil. Only in our country, faith in Zelensky as commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces grows with each passing day. If you don’t believe it, play the TV channels – BNT, bTV and NOVA. Zelensky does resemble Francisco López, a 19th-century Paraguayan president who, in wars against Brazil and Argentina, exterminated 90% of his country’s male population in a short period of time. The New York Times expects Putin to play the role of Santa Claus, bourgeois good-natured, and bring a nice Christmas present to Washington.
However, the gift will be from Santa Claus, the personification of the Russian winter cold, a strong and sometimes cruel hero from Slavic mythology, reborn as the bearer of New Year’s gifts from Soviet times…
*The comment is from the Facebook profile of the international analyst Boyan Chukov, the title is Flagman.bg
2023-12-26 21:18:33
#Putin #Ready #Truce #Ukraine #York #Times #Smoke #Screen
