“When an air target is tracked on an air defense radar, it doesn’t actually say what kind of missile it is. Therefore, I urge you to trust only official sources. You can study the wreckage only after the fall of this missile. The place where the wreckage fell is always examined, explosives technicians and experts work there “. Then the wreckage is studied by experts from both the Air Force and the Kyiv Research Institute of Pre-trial Expertise,” Shamanov said.
He also noted that making preliminary conclusions is “unprofessional and unethical.”
“When in some Telegram channels we see some photo of an incomprehensible source with the inscription 3M22… excuse me, it looks like it was scratched on a piece of debris with a nail. Drawing conclusions is at least unprofessional and unethical, so we will wait for the conclusions of the experts and only then we will be able to actually say, “, the speaker added.
What preceded
Yesterday, information appeared in the media that Russia could have used the SM22 Zircon anti-ship hypersonic missile during a missile attack on Kyiv on the morning of February 7.
The use of the above-mentioned missile is indicated by photographs of the wreckage published on social networks. In particular, in one of the photos the marking “3M22” is visible on the fragment.
This inscription corresponds to the markings of this particular missile, which, together with the Russian X-47 Kinzhal, is also called Putin’s so-called “wunderwaffe”.
Read about what is known about the Zircon missile and whether the Russians could really attack Kyiv with it in the RBC-Ukraine article.
2024-02-08 20:10:03
#Zircon #launched #Kyiv #February #KGVA #commented
