/ world at present information/ It is actually paradoxical, however a reality! Within the Ministry of Training and Science, which needs to be an undisputed mannequin, so far as the sensible utility of the data discovered in Bulgarian colleges is worried, the primary consultants – Bulgarian philologists – systematically make errors within the examination assessments! Sixth yr now! And people who fatefully mirror with a detrimental signal on the grades of the highschool seniors and on the factors obtained by the seventh graders. This has turn out to be a convention.
This yr’s assessments for greater training establishments and better training establishments in Bulgarian language and literature aren’t any exception. The issue with process 7. from the primary module of the state matriculation examination turned fairly noisy. There was no means that each the consultants and the leaders from the Ministry of Training and Tradition wouldn’t search for a means out of the complicated scenario. The so-called “chief skilled” in Bulgarian language and literature insisted on the BTV display screen that there was no mistake within the reply to process 7. He defiantly needed the indignant to say which rule was violated by way of the non-participative type of the noun “fee”.
The sentence during which it was used was taken out of context. Nicely, all 4 sentences on this process are taken out of context! This scientist – an unlearned “skilled” ought to have discovered the principles for naming names already in elementary college, after which in college. It’s not possible for a younger and bold candidate writing a “motivational letter” to not know to which committee he’ll current his causes, in order that it’s undefined and subsequently the phrase is unmembered. The demagogic clarification of Deputy Minister T.M. that there was no mistake within the reply to the duty, however as a result of raging reactions among the many public, the staff of the Ministry of Training and Tradition determined to present all highschool college students the stipulated 1 level. Within the interview on Might 24, the Minister of Training and Science replied to the journalist that there was a mistake, however it was that query 7. received into the query financial institution. No, Mr. Minister, the error, an enormous one, is within the number of personnel within the establishment entrusted to you. It was admitted by your predecessors, however … the errors within the examination assessments multiply yearly. And so … to infinity!? As a result of no person fired them after their confirmed illiteracy, no person requested for his or her resignations. All of us have already got the sensation that incompetents will maintain their positions for all times – like bishops and patriarchs. With a view to be convincing, the leaders of the Ministry of Training and Tradition identified that a number of committees are concerned within the preparation of the examination assessments. It turns into clear that each one the members of those commissions are illiterate, as quickly as they admit or fail to notice apparent errors. If that’s the case, is that the place they belong? Their inclusion within the composition of every fee is completed by order of the minister!
There may be extra proof of the incompetence of the compilers of this yr’s HVO and DZI assessments. The wording of the query in process 18. is inaccurate: “Which of Ivan Vazov’s works stands out because the motive for the frustration with the post-liberation actuality?” The preposition “B” is lacking initially of the interrogative sentence. Do the MES specialists know what sort of error that is? The truth that they don’t even know the precise title of Vaz’s emblematic poem – the lyrical confession “Linee nasht popolenie” can be maddening. Within the phrase “era” they wrote “i” as an alternative of the letter “ь” in subsection A) of the identical process. Who offers them the correct to alter the writer textual content? Do they know that in verse the rhythmic step is an iamb?
In drawback 19, a grammatical error was additionally made – within the article. And within the textual content of the compilers, not in a “sentence taken out of context”, as Tringov justifies. “The pursuit of private achieve, contempt for social beliefs and cultural values are attribute issues within the works of:”. The noun “works” on this sentence should be articled – “the works”. Ought to we clarify to the “consultants” why we must always? They may even be taught one thing!
An incorrect reply was additionally given to process 14. within the check for HEV in Bulgarian language and literature for the seventh grade, as a result of “from 20%” is a circumstantial clarification, and never a part of the composite predicate: “is smaller”. Solely the indicated potential solutions to the query of process 13. within the HVO check associated to quotation aren’t appropriate. The expression “skier avalanches” is in figurative use – that is the opposite appropriate reply. Will or not it’s graded correctly by examiners after some seventh graders have given it?
The textual content for studying comprehension, in addition to the data from the desk, have been unsuccessfully chosen, as a result of they’re strictly scientific – from the sphere of meteorology, and its specifics are unknown to 13-year-old youngsters. They misplaced lots of time attempting to make sense of them.
From all of the ugliness within the examination choices and within the solutions to the questions in them within the final 6 years, it’s clear that professionalism is already a factor of the previous for individuals who are up there! The horrible factor is that the youngsters are the victims: as a result of incompetence of the ministerial “consultants” they lose factors, obtain biased – decrease grades, and therefore their decrease rating within the rating for persevering with training is fashioned. Will not the conscience of these responsible of ruining the destiny of younger individuals lastly chew them?
Why are college linguists criminally silent about errors? Particularly those that write textbooks?! In order that they aren’t kicked out of the “cradle” of the Ministry of Training and Tradition?! Or is their dignity as scientists crushed by the unbridled profiteering component? It’s apparent – they’ve brilliantly mastered and put into observe Bai Gagno’s philosophy: “Do not kick your self in opposition to the grain!”, “There’s a firecracker in these items.”, “Folks have gathered steam.” That is proper – they need to additionally “hit the cow”!
#traditions #…the #errors #Ministry #Training #Tradition
