Head of GERB Parliamentary Group, Desislava Atanasova, expressed her surprise and outrage at the composition of a recent meeting with the PP-DB. Atanasova and deputy chairman of GERB, Tomislav Donchev, had discussions with the PP-DB in parliament to discuss constitutional reform and options for a management agreement between the two coalitions.
Atanasova criticized the format of the meeting, stating that there were no representatives of parliamentary groups or authorized persons present. She also expressed her disappointment that none of the leaders of the PP-DB attended the meeting, resulting in a discussion on the topic for only 20 minutes. Atanasova further criticized the program with which the MC operates, claiming that it was made in an Excel spreadsheet by individuals who do not have the status of people’s representatives.
Atanasova emphasized that the new appointments and decision-making do not align with GERB’s views, despite the government being elected with their votes. She pointed out that there are no nominations for regional governors and candidates for deputy ministers, indicating a lack of consensus. Atanasova stressed that GERB should not bear responsibility for these nominations, as they were not involved in the decision-making process.
Tomislav Donchev echoed Atanasova’s concerns and questioned whether the government is a minority or majority government. He called for clarity on this matter and insisted on a coalition agreement with clear commitments. Donchev warned of potential abuses of the state apparatus in favor of one party for the upcoming local elections.
The discussion also touched on the common goal of constitutional reform, with the PP-DB and DPS joining the conversation. Atanasova expressed readiness for talks with other parties to introduce a common project for changes to the constitution.
Overall, the meeting between GERB and the PP-DB was met with disappointment and frustration due to the lack of representation and clarity on important issues. The need for a coalition agreement and shared responsibility was emphasized by both Atanasova and Donchev.
What were the concerns expressed by Head of GERB Parliamentary Group Desislava Atanasova regarding the recent meeting with the PP-DB?
Head of GERB Parliamentary Group, Desislava Atanasova, expressed her surprise and outrage at the recent meeting with the PP-DB. Atanasova and GERB deputy chairman, Tomislav Donchev, had discussions with the PP-DB in parliament regarding constitutional reform and potential management agreements between the two coalitions.
Atanasova criticized the meeting format, stating that there were no representatives from parliamentary groups or authorized persons present. She also expressed disappointment that none of the PP-DB leaders attended the meeting, resulting in a discussion on the topic for only 20 minutes. Atanasova further criticized the management program used by the PP-DB, claiming that it was created by individuals who do not have the status of people’s representatives.
Atanasova emphasized that the new appointments and decision-making do not align with GERB’s views, despite the government being elected with their votes. She pointed out the lack of nominations for regional governors and candidates for deputy ministers, indicating a lack of consensus. Atanasova stressed that GERB should not be held responsible for these nominations, as they were not involved in the decision-making process.
Tomislav Donchev echoed Atanasova’s concerns and questioned whether the government is a minority or majority government. He called for clarity on this matter and insisted on a coalition agreement with clear commitments. Donchev warned of potential abuses of the state apparatus in favor of one party during the upcoming local elections.
The discussion also touched on the common goal of constitutional reform, with the PP-DB and DPS joining the conversation. Atanasova expressed readiness for talks with other parties to introduce a collaborative project for changes to the constitution.
Overall, the meeting between GERB and the PP-DB was met with disappointment and frustration due to the lack of representation and clarity on important issues. Both Atanasova and Donchev emphasized the need for a coalition agreement and shared responsibility.
This intriguing article sheds light on an unexpected twist in the leadership meeting, highlighting the pressing need for clear communication about the government’s existence. Transparency and clarity are undoubtedly essential for instilling trust and confidence in the public.