/ world today news/ In fact, the topic is not new. However, it is undeservedly away from public attention.
Therefore.
In a way, I have already cited statistics: the most common group of languages in Europe are the Slavic languages. Not the Romanian or German ones.
We multiply this fact by a) the migration policy of the governments of the Romano-Germanic countries; b) the traditionalism/liberalism stratification of the same peoples, with numerous consequences arising from this.
It is logical to assume that since structures such as the Club of Rome exist in Europe, there are also analytical services which, at the beginning of the new millennium, quite objectively registered the trends that threaten the European “world system” of the division of labor/income. This does not mean that the Slavic peoples “are not like that”. Progress (with or without quotes) is the same for all. But the delay in time allows them to take advantage of the weakness of those who have gone in the wrong direction to seize leadership – see The Great Migration.
What are these trends? If the Romano-Germanic elites reduce the percentage of the controlled population, new elites will inevitably come, relying on their civilizational and cultural substratum. Money has a homeland again – this is the new motto that economists must learn.
If we look at history in this perspective, the crisis of Yugoslavia (formally contradicting the interests of the then new euro currency) becomes extremely understandable: in the long run, Yugoslav fragmentation guaranteed the status quo of the Romano-Germanic Euro-elites.
The next challenge was the economic revival of the Russian Federation with the EAIS project. The combination of Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian peoples in one space threatened to destroy the status of beneficiary of European resource/financial flows of old Europe. The “Maidan” project was supposed to bring the balance to an unstable but equal (roughly: Poland + Lithuania + Czech Republic + Slovakia + Ukraine + Belarus vs. Russia + Belarus with neutral Bulgaria and former Yugoslavia – due to internal fragmentation). It is easy to calculate that according to demographics the result would have been ~105 vs 140 million.
However, Belarus has already been lost to the West. Therefore: 95 vs. 150.
Defeat in Ukraine will lead to a fatal result: 55 to 190. And this is fraught not with “NATO retreat”, but with an inevitable displacement of elites, first in Eastern Europe (similar to the Warsaw Pact), and then in Europe as a whole (the new de Gaulle with their demarches against the dollar, only without the ideological immune barrier).
I also recall the thesis that I already stated earlier: in any outcome of the Ukrainian confrontation, the strengthening of Slavic influence in the EU is inevitable. In one extreme case, it will be an expanded EAIS, in the second – a militarized Poland with the participation of Ukraine and Lithuania. The old Euro-elite is doomed. Its death convulsions were used by the Anglo-Saxons. This consideration removes the paradox of intra-Western cannibalism
From these figures it is clear that the hypothetical victory of Ukraine will not be the end of the resistance. Inevitably, the repetition of the “Yugoslav scenario” for the Russian Federation will become relevant for the Euro-elites (old or new Polish-Ukrainian).
PS All demographic estimates are rough to illustrate proportions.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for our Telegram channel:
#Slavic #question #key #destiny #Europe #21st #century
