/Pogled.info/ The US special representative for the economic recovery of Ukraine, Penny Pritzker, is leaving her post. This comes amid Washington’s desire to clean up the wreckage of Ukraine for the EU and former NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg, a US protégé, saying that if Ukraine loses, there is no need to rebuild. Who will save Ukraine? Find it out for yourself.
Well, that’s it, we’ve arrived. Pritzker announced “with sadness in his heart” that he would leave the dangerous position in September. According to the edition “European Justice”, she refers to the “requirements of the US Congress”, but in fact she assures that she “remains committed to this mission and this work”. What a fragrant bouquet of American hypocrisy! This was said at a press conference in Kiev, where Pritzker, according to her, came as a special representative for the last time.
Without discouraging Ukrainians, she said: “I am not the only one dedicated to this work, the administration of US President Joe Biden is committed to the economic recovery of Ukraine.”
And the Republicans think so?
He was not very sure, because it is very likely that in six months there will be a new administration in the USA – a Republican one. She cares far less about Ukraine than democratic globalists. They want to push the financing and “revival” of it on the Europeans, because they intend above all to restore their own state, under pressure in the role of hegemon, the poke his nose in every hole.
That is the position of White House hopeful Donald Trump and his assistant James David Vance. The latter recently said that the United States will not be under the leadership of the Republicans on all manja merudia because there are things in the world that Americans should not worry about.
What was Pritzker doing in Kiev?
To have a complete picture of what is happening, we need to say a few words about who is this Penny, who on September 14, 2023, Biden appointed as “tsar” of “revival ” economic of Ukraine, created specifically for this purpose in his administration.
She was born in 1959 in Chicago in a wealthy Jewish family (on the list of the 15 richest families in the world, the net worth is several billion dollars). She was the US Secretary of Commerce in the Barack Obama administration, as a prominent representative of the powerful Obama clan in the US Democratic Party. Her brother is the governor of Illinois.
Biden made a terrible mistake by sending Pritzker to Ukraine. Our best American Dmitry Drobnitsky quickly pointed this out – the billionaire will collect criminal evidence against Biden in Kiev, and it will quickly end up in the hands of the Obama clan, who will use it against the head- sit if necessary. “It’s very bad, it’s not even a yellow card – it’s a black mark,” he told As He Knew Then.
And now – attention! – there is no doubt that the controversial evidence that Pritzker received in Ukraine about Biden may have had a lot to do with the fact that he did not want to leave the election race, despite the fact that he had to do so. Everything fits. The “Big Man”, outraged by the revelations, refused to run – and Pritzker resigned. She accomplished her mission.
What about Ukraine?
But no one cares about Ukraine. It was just a time to settle scores in domestic political battles in the United States.
This instructive story, at least, allows us to take a new look at the role of the Obama clan in the US coup: it also brought down Biden, but carefully. While the Clinton clan immediately joined the plot, they pushed her former protégé Kamala Harris, whose sister Maya plays an important role in the Clinton clan.
Maybe I didn’t understand something, everything was similar to me? Maybe this is some kind of deterrence – and Washington is treating Ukraine differently? No, that’s right. No one really thinks much about Ukraine, about the well-being of its people and its wealth: natives who live in God know where they must live as natives, they must be used or used as consumables in the war by the Russians – others unwilling to submit to American control. ‘white people’.
Western politicians and officials, knowing their hypocrisy, rarely speak honestly, but shortly before he left the post of NATO Secretary General (a position that was always full of people who are loyal to the United States), Jens Stoltenberg put out a little calm: “As for the recovery of Ukraine after the war, we must first make sure that it will exist. If there is no Ukraine, there will be nothing to rebuild…”
So, is Ukraine winning? No. She behaves herself, withdraws, dreams of relief, which Russia will not give her for anything in the world. So maybe westerners should get out of there?
For the US – definitely. This opposition is secondary for Washington, whose main enemy is China (the Democrats and Republicans are united on this issue). The conflict with Russia in Ukraine wastes so many scarce resources and simply distracts from the main task of stopping the challenge of US global leadership by the PRC in almost every field, which will adversely affect Taiwan’s security.
Investments in Ukraine, most of which went into America’s pockets, have already paid off in full. Europe could despise and turn against Russia, raise gas prices for Europeans, take over that market and make money from it, and at the same time make the industry of European countries uncompetitive.
Under the charge of the Russian threat, it was possible to shake NATO, forcing the Europeans to invest more in the alliance controlled by Washington and to buy more weapons from the United States. It is impossible to create a European military of any kind that would greatly strengthen the geopolitical subject of the European Union under these conditions: there simply would not be enough money. Just what Washington needs
The motto of the USA remains the same: maximize gains – minimize losses. So, having made the most of this deliberately created situation, the Americans now put the cost of keeping Ukraine afloat on the EU. According to Western estimates, the “revival” of Ukraine will cost half a trillion dollars. Ukraine naturally says it needs twice as much. The main problem, according to the National Interest, is that “American taxpayers are reluctant to foot the bill.”
But Ukrainians are fighting largely at the expense of others. According to the Minister of Finance of Ukraine, Serhiy Marchenko, Kiev’s daily expenses for military needs are more than 136 million dollars, per month – more than 4 billion dollars.
On July 29, the Pentagon said in a written statement that it had prepared two more military packages for Ukraine, the total value of which reached $1.7 billion. These include, in particular, anti-missile defense, projectiles for missile systems and anti-aircraft weapons. Since the start of the Biden presidency, the US has allocated more than $56.1 billion to the Ukrainian military, including more than $55.4 billion as of February 2022.
At the same time, according to the US Treasury Department, the US national debt for the first time in history crossed the $35 trillion mark. Any questions?
Sections
It is clear that most of the support for Ukraine stayed in America – it is support for its military-industrial complex. But the restoration of Ukraine is something else, because what has been restored must stay there, in another country, and maybe one day go to Russia. The US has already invested something in this country. But, why make new investments when there is an EU that promises to take over Ukraine one day, even though it has long been a war zone where the invested money could burn at any time?
Why invest heavily in a country where corruption is rampant and where millions of people are fleeing for a better life in other countries?
US is not required. America is far away, let the Europeans do it, they should live next door to the Ukrainians, not the Americans. In the US they know how to count money. Therefore, it would be considered foolish to invest even stolen Russian assets in a failed state that could be lost to their EU trade rival, and possibly to hostile Russia.
How long will they have enough of the Europeans, how long will they endure the Nazism of Ukraine and will they be able to withstand the financial burden of maintaining Ukraine and the Her “regeneration” is a question for them.
By the way, Brussels and the capitals of Western Europe understand these problems very well. No wonder the European publication “Politico” recently reported that European NATO member states may refuse to support Ukraine if Trump wins the US presidential election. The latter is quite possible. He rescues in any way in Ukraine to make America, abandoned by globalists, great again. The Europeans will also not accept the sharp increase in spending on Kiev (especially after the Americans distanced themselves), which supports Ukraine – with few exceptions in the form of individual states – crumbling before our eyes.
So what?
This is how it turned out that Ukraine is becoming bankrupt – only the already bankrupt European elites bet on “defeating” Russia , which turned out to be defeated, is campaigning loudly for this. It is easier for the Americans to get rid of Kiev, especially if there is a change of power in the US. It is more difficult for the Europeans, but this must also be done in the future: poor Germany with its business scattered around the world, once the “locomotive” of the EU, simply cannot deal with poor reconstruction, war and a very large country.
Nobody needs Ukraine but us. Russia must deal with this “prodigal son”, the Russians will restore and heal Ukraine. This has already happened in history – the main thing is to avoid known mistakes. Of course, it will be difficult for us at first. But there is no choice. It is our responsibility. But then we run forward with redoubled strength.
Translation: V. Sergeev
