Hello.
I repeat what I said earlier – it makes no sense to compare Tecno Phantom X2 Pro with the flagship from Samsung, the models perform in completely different classes, however, like brands. But I am curious that Tecno ordered a customized camera from Samsung (GNV model), the lens is seven glass lenses, there is ISOCELL 3.0 technology inside. ISOCELL GNV module is used, it can be customized and very end. Before that, Chinese companies used such a module in their flagships, for example, we see Vivo X80 with it. Matrix size 1/1.3 inch, pixel size 1.2 µm. At the presentation of the Phantom X2 Pro, the camera was shown in different conditions and showed very interesting images. But now it’s time to compare it to the camera that Samsung uses in its flagship.
I won’t describe how the votes were distributed under each pair of shots, as only two shots with the Phantom turned out to be successful. We will discuss this point in the conclusion.
Snapshot no. 1. Sugar in sachets
Snapshot no. 2. Benedict for breakfast
Snapshot no. 3. Bananas
Snapshot no. 4. Cup on the table
Snapshot no. 5. Palm trees and building
Snapshot no. 6. Retro cars
Snapshot no. 7. Mannequin in suit
Snapshot no. 8. Cup and teapot on the table
Snapshot no. 9. Cup with coffee
Snapshot no. 10. Beach
Snapshot no. 11. Swimming pool
Snapshot no. 12. hotel building
Snapshot no. 13. neon signs
Snapshot no. 14. Close-up portrait of a girl
Snapshot no. 15. Faces of figures in the dark
Snapshot no. 16. The dummy raises his hand
Snapshot no. 17. Christmas decorations
Snapshot no. 18. Horse against the background of the building
Miracles, of course, happen, but not in this case. The flagship from Samsung has a 50 megapixel module, formally also the flagship from Tecno, and this is a new custom module from Samsung. And I must say that the Phantom shoots decently for a Chinese flagship in this price range, but it is definitely inferior to Samsung itself. The two shots where the Phantom performs noticeably better are night shots of a car and neon signs. In all other cases, a clear advantage is in favor of Samsung.
I can’t say the results were unexpected. But it is important to correct them, because in three or four years the gap between the flagships of different companies will narrow. And that’s the starting point of what we have in practice today. It is in this capacity that this material should be considered. Thanks for voting!
