Table of Contents
Vladimir Putin’s speech had many ramifications with the relationship between Russia and Britain being particularly tense. The reason? It is none other than the use of Storm Shadow missiles by Ukrainian forces to strike Russian territory.
Britain is now directly involved in the war in Ukraine, Russia’s ambassador to the UK said today, following reports that British long-range missiles were used by the Ukrainian military to strike targets inside Russian territory.
“Britain and the United Kingdom are now directly involved in this war, because this launch could not have happened without NATO personnel, but also British personnel.”Andrey Kelin told Sky News.
A statement that was made a few hours before Vladimir Putin sent a clear message to the West. The Russian leader warned that his country has the right to use weapons against those who use weapons against Russia. In case of “escalation”, Putin continued: “We will respond symmetrically”.
He pointed out that after Ukraine’s recent strikes with long-range missiles, “the region has acquired elements of a global conflict.”
“We are still ready today”
At the same time, the deputy chief of the general staff of the British armed forces, responding to a question about the readiness to get involved in the event of an escalation with Russia, was clear.
“I don’t think anyone in this room can be under the illusion that if the Russians invaded eastern Europe tonight, we wouldn’t be facing them in battle,” Rob Magowan, deputy chief of staff, told a British House of Commons committee. armed forces.
The US knew about the missile
The United States was warned by Russia shortly before the strike with an experimental intermediate-range ballistic missile in Dnipro, Ukraine, through nuclear risk mitigation channels, a US official said.
According to the Reuters agency, the US in recent days has informed Ukraine and its close allies to help these countries prepare for the possible use of the experimental missile.
The US official said Moscow likely only has a handful of such missiles.
#relationship #Russia #Britain #red #knew #missile #test
**How does the use of Storm Shadow missiles by Ukraine, supplied by Western nations, potentially shift the dynamics of the conflict beyond a proxy war and towards a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO members?**
## World Today News: Special Report - Escalation in Ukraine
**Introduction:**
Welcome viewers to World Today News. This week, the conflict in Ukraine reached a potentially dangerous new stage following the use of Storm Shadow missiles by Ukrainian forces to strike targets inside Russian territory. This has led to heated rhetoric and accusations from both sides. To unpack the implications of these developments, we’re joined today by two esteemed experts: Dr. [Guest 1 Name], a renowned expert on Russian foreign policy, and Dr. [Guest 2 Name], a specialist in international security and arms control.
**Section 1: Escalation and Direct Involvement**
* Dr. [Guest 1 Name], Russia’s ambassador to the UK has stated that Britain is now “directly involved in the war” due to its supply of the Storm Shadow missiles. Do you agree with this assessment, and what are the implications for the broader conflict?
* Dr. [Guest 2 Name], we heard Putin warn of a “symmetrical response” to any further escalation. What forms could this potentially take, and how serious a threat do you see this posing to Western nations?
**Section 2: The Role of NATO and the West**
* Dr. [Guest 1 Name], Ukraine has argued that it has the right to defend itself against Russian aggression. Do you believe Western nations, including Britain, are justified in providing increasingly sophisticated weaponry? Where should the line be drawn?
* Dr. [Guest 2 Name], Deputy Chief of the British armed forces stated that the UK would “be facing [Russia] in battle” if they attacked Eastern Europe. Does this statement reflect a willingness to directly confront Russia, and what are the potential consequences of such a scenario?
**Section 3: International Diplomacy and Nuclear Risks**
* Dr. [Guest 1 Name], the US was reportedly warned by Russia about the potential use of the experimental missile before the strike in Dnipro. How significant is this type of communication channel in managing nuclear risks, and how effective do you believe it is?
* Dr. [Guest 2 Name], with the potential use of experimental weapons like the Storm Shadow missile, do you see the risks of the conflict escalating to a more dangerous level? What steps, if any, can be taken to de-escalate the situation and encourage diplomatic solutions?
**Section 4: Looking Ahead**
* Dr. [Guest 1 Name], what do you see as the potential long-term consequences of the current trajectory of the conflict? How might this impact the future of relations between Russia and the West?
* Dr. [Guest 2 Name], what role do you see international organizations like the UN playing in finding a resolution to the conflict? What potential pathways exist for peaceful negotiations and a lasting solution?
**Closing:**
Thank you both for your insightful perspectives. This is a complex and evolving situation with no easy answers. We hope this discussion has shed some light on the key issues and potential ramifications of the latest developments in the war in Ukraine.
