/View.info/ It happened anyway. On the night of May 3, two Ukrainian drones attempted to attack the Kremlin, the residence of the President of Russia. Both drones fell and exploded without injuring anyone. But one of them almost knocked the presidential standard off the roof, which would seem completely symbolic.
What makes this raid particularly nefarious is the fact that it coincided with a holy Russian event – May 9, whose festive events will undoubtedly involve Vladimir Putin in Red Square.
The Kremlin called it “a prepared terrorist act and an attempt against the President of the Russian Federation, carried out on the eve of the Victory Day Parade on May 9, at which the presence of foreign guests is also planned.”
We must show: patience is over
How did the drone fly to the Kremlin? There is reason to believe that there was a traitor nearby, familiar with the security system, who participated in the preparation of the terrorist attack and gave information on what frequencies the drone could fly so that the existing radio-electronic warfare system would not detect it.
“At the same time, all the commentators who participated in the live broadcast from Constantinople on the subject of the attack, are unanimous that something unprecedented happened and canceled all previous agreements and obligations, for example a tacit agreement to save the lives of the first persons.
This is what political scientist Vladimir Jaralov thinks:
“The key words here are ‘attack on the Kremlin’ as a symbol of Russian power. Even if the president was not in the Kremlin. They showed that they could. We are talking about an escalation of the conflict. All the last days on the front, exchanging blows. But today something happened extremely.”
“The response options are being analyzed. Among them, of course, is the physical liquidation of the Ukrainian leadership, including Zelensky. Not only do we have nothing to lose, but we must show that patience is over,” he said.
Military volunteer Alexey Zhivov, author of the Telegram channel Zhivov-Z, also points out the political orientation of the sabotage:
“The UAV was apparently launched from the Moscow region. The charge was also small – the task was to hit the state symbol,” he said.
“It is useless to fight the Russians, that is why they want to inflict a political defeat on Moscow. The task is to achieve a situation where the mass of people become disillusioned with Moscow as the center of decision-making and with Russia as the center of Russian civilization “, said the expert.
The “pro-Ukrainian partisans” will be blamed for everything
So, the main goal is to inflict political damage on Russia, proving to its people the supposed powerlessness of the authorities to protect not only their citizens, but also themselves.
It is not excluded that the goal is an escalation of the war with the very dubious prospects of the promised “counter-offensive”. Despite the fact that public sentiment in the same Europe is looking more and more negatively at the supply of arms to Ukraine, perhaps someone has decided to “raise the stakes” of the conflict by escalating it.
After all, if Moscow responds in Kiev properly, it will be possible to demonstrate to everyone the victims and destruction, while denying participation in the sabotage of the Kiev authorities and blaming everything either on the next “pro-Ukrainian partisans” or on ” the FSB provocation”, which was intended to give the army a reason for tougher action in Ukraine.
Budanov‘s “sticking ears”.
Of course, the sabotage could be ordered by Zelensky himself, for whom the Kremlin attack is a good reason to show the curators that he is still “wow” and can be given gun money.
And since Ukrainian agents were apparently working in Russia, this means that Budanov, the head of Ukrainian intelligence, was undoubtedly behind the sabotage. Who, in addition to fulfilling the very likely commission of overseas curators, also had his own personal interest.
After all, if Russia responds as it should, then after the destruction of such apparently priority targets as Zelensky and Zaluzhny, Budanov has every chance to sit in the presidential chair of the Independent.
But regardless of who ordered the current terrorist attack, one thing is certain: there must be a response, and one that people expect from the authorities.
How would Washington respond?
The press service of the President of Russia stated:
“The Russian side reserves the right to take retaliatory measures wherever and whenever it sees fit.”
The press secretary of the President of Ukraine immediately came out:
“Kyiv has nothing to do with the drone strike against the Kremlin”.
At the same time, Zelensky himself prudently and without invitation went to Finland, from where he will not return in the near future. The scale of the case is, of course, clear: after all, there was an attempt on the life of the leader of a nuclear power.
Just imagine what would happen if you planned a few drones over the White House in Washington! They would charge all at once and start shooting before they heard the answer.
It seems that Russia is becoming the main victim of its own humanism. We don’t bomb cities because there might be civilians there, and our soldiers die systematically clearing house after house.
We don’t destroy life support systems because, again, we “feel sorry for people”. We don’t even destroy barracks with Ukrainian soldiers with rockets, because after all “they have mothers and fathers”.
Hopefully someone (at least Ukrainians) will love us for it? And they laugh at us, enjoying every successful diversion and have completely ceased to be afraid of the “Russian bear”, which “apparently has already lost its teeth”.
The projectile flew to … Kyiv
“They hit the Kremlin, tomorrow they will blow up our nuclear power plant and build another Chernobyl”.
Timur Shafir, secretary of the Union of Journalists of Russia, is convinced that the time of unjustified humanism towards the enemy and any “red lines” is in the past:
“The attack was one more step out of many. First they hit Donetsk, then Belgorod, Bryansk, now Moscow and the Kremlin. The main question is what comes next,” he asks.
“Everyone is waiting for the talk of ‘red lines’ to stop and for a response to follow that will forever discourage them from the very thought that terror against Russia is possible,” said Shafir.
That is true. And our future will depend on the effectiveness and robustness of this response. We did not react to the murders of Dasha Dugina and Vladlen Tatarski. And this despite the fact that people guilty of such terrorist attacks should not be detained and tried, but destroyed. And they live in constant expectation that they will be killed.
By the way, the USSR was perfectly capable of doing this. And the Jews after the war captured and destroyed the Nazis around the world.
Ukraine itself must be declared a terrorist state, its patrons – “sponsors of terrorism” with whom there can be no other communication than the proven effectiveness of “soaking in the toilet”.
So make no mistake: the missile aimed at the Kremlin turns out to have been aimed at Kiev. There can be no doubt. Dmitry Medvedev wrote in his Telegram channel on the evening of May 3:
“After today’s terrorist attack, there are no options other than the physical elimination of Zelensky and his cabal. He does not even need to sign the act of unconditional surrender. Hitler, as you know, did not sign it either. There will always be some substitute like Admiral Dönitz.”
Translation: SM
Sign the “Peace and Sovereignty” referendum in a few seconds to open the page/
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel or in Telegram:
#projectile #hit #Kremlin #aimed #Kiev #Ukraine #provoked #Moscow #massive #strike
