The observation is clear for the Minister Delegate responsible for academic success and vocational education: “This program as it stands is not acceptable and must be reviewed. » Asked about the sex education program at school, Alexandre Portier expressed reservations during questions to the government in the Senate this Wednesday, November 27, indicates BFMTV. Advocating for a program that helps children “to understand the world around them”the minister also insisted that he was “out of the question of letting anything and everything happen”.
A response to criticism following the measures present in this program defended by the Minister of National Education, Anne Genetet. If the Catholic Family Associations (AFC) recognized a few days ago that it took into account education in intimacy, risk prevention and the fight against abuse and discrimination, it was not acceptable to many reasons, according to them. Posing as a father of a family, Alexandre Portier insisted that he was going to“personally commit to ensuring that gender theory does not find its place in our schools, because it should not have its place there”to the applause of the senators.
The rest after this ad
No “activism” in schools
Pleading for a “better consideration of development” students, Alexandre Portier recalled that all the concepts mentioned in the subjects must “obviously be based on the development of our students and with wisdom to decide with the Academy of Sciences and the Academy of Medicine what is most appropriate”. The delegate minister went further: for him, “Militancy has no place in our schools either. » This is why he demands “very strict supervision of all those involved who will have to deal with these subjects”.
The rest after this ad
The text is still in the finalization phase and must be validated in December for implementation from the start of the 2025 school year. Although the program has normally been compulsory since 2001, it is still rarely applied and “less than 15% of students benefit from all three sessions”explained the Economic, Social and Environmental Council (Cese) a few weeks ago. Catholic Family Associations denounce in the future Evars program that parents are made invisible, that gender is omnipresent, that consent is promoted as a new ethical norm or that emotions are exploited.
As BFMTV reminds us, if the Minister of National Education defended a “very progressive, very sequenced program”he could do “reduce the amount of consumption of pornographic images”. According to Anne Genetet, gender theory “is absolutely not present in this program”. However, it is not really to the taste of several collectives, in particular La Manif pour tous having criticized a project “scandalous”Also “under woke influence and imbued with ideology”.
