/ world today news/ Twisting, scams and competition in bowing to the government. We saw this during the vote on today’s enslaving debt of BGN 16 billion. The Government of the Four, although it does not realize it, with today’s welcome support from DPS, BDC and tutti-quants, has totally delegitimized itself and inevitably headed for a premature end of his term.
What happened to turn so many DPS, ABV, BDC, and PF, who put verbal balances against the loan before the time came to vote “Yes” in the plenary hall? The formal answer is that they found an excuse in Vladislav Goranov’s empty promise that BGN 14 billion of the funds voted today would be spent, not BGN 16.
Is Goranov’s promise valid?
None. Today Goranov is a minister, tomorrow he is not. The agreement says “8 billion euros”, i.e. BGN 16 billion. The fact that Goranov had promised himself something is absolutely untenable. About Goranov’s morals, I will only say that he and Menda Stoyanova were MPs from the opposition in 2013 and as such joined the circus called “The Night of the White Bus”. You judge how much the word of a person who a little more than a year ago blew a protester’s vuvuzela for 1 billion, and today is a loan importer for 16 billion.
However, DPS, ABV and BDC found enough “cover” in these empty statements of Goranov to turn 180 degrees and give up speaking in recent days. They found a fig leaf. Also worthy of attention is the Patriotic Front, who said they would vote “no”, but in the end half of them were not in the hall, and those who were still there voted “abstain”.
The rulers did not answer whose are these old debts that we will pay with part of this huge loan. They did not say that 4.6 billion were obligations assumed by Borisov at the end of last year, and 2 billion assumed again by Borisov as Prime Minister, but in his first term, are due. They failed to comply with demands for transparency and clarity on where the money would go, which implicitly proves that it will sink into “Sanitation”-style criminal schemes, powering piggy banks and buying elections. They refused, even without arguments, to vote for the loan by name, something that “Modern Bulgaria” insisted on. The truth is that they were ashamed to admit that they did not want to know who voted and how. Because Vidovden will come and they will be asked for responsibility, and it is clear that these are people who run away from responsibility like the devil from incense.
The way out of the crisis that created this incompetent government is only one – resignation! Resignation and new elections. I assure you that this is the most dangerous option for the Four and their DPS paraphernalia, because many of their voters will not support them again. There is no RB voter who agrees with the so-called “reformers” to vote in a package with DPS, as they did today. There is no PF voter who would agree to vote in a package with DPS, as happened today. Every single one of the “gang of four” lied to their constituents to come to power. Today we saw that this power is supported by the DPS. Therefore – elections! And let’s see if many of those who today enslaved Bulgaria with BGN 16 billion will even end up in the parliament.
#profitmaking #loan #showed #true #face #rulers
What are the potential long-term economic ramifications for Bulgaria following the government’s decision to acquire a BGN 16 billion loan for debt relief?
As a professional website editor for world-today-news.com, I would like to present an interview with two experts on the topic of the recent vote on enslaving debt of BGN 16 billion. Our first guest is Georgi Bliznakov, an economist and political analyst, and our second guest is Dimitar Lyutskanov, a political science professor.
Georgi Bliznakov, as an economist, can you shed some light on the reasons behind the government’s decision to take out such a large loan? And how do you think this will affect the economy and the citizens of Bulgaria in the long run?
Dimitar Lyutskanov, as a political scientist, what is your opinion on how the government has handled this situation? Do you think they made the right decision by pushing the vote through despite opposition from some parties? And what impact do you think this will have on their popularity and their ability to govern effectively?
Georgi Bliznakov, some critics argue that the government’s decision to take out the loan was necessary to stabilize the economy and prevent further instability. Do you agree with this assessment? And if so, what measures should be taken to ensure that the funds are used responsibly and effectively?
Dimitar Lyutskanov, on the other hand, you have argued that the government has ”totally delegitimized itself.” Can you elaborate on this statement? And what alternative solutions do you believe could have been pursued instead of taking out such a large loan?
Looking ahead, do both of you believe that this vote is indicative of a larger trend in Bulgarian politics, or is this a unique situation? What changes, if any, need to be made to the political system to ensure transparency and accountability in times of financial crisis?
