Home » World » The population of NATO countries is teaching him to think about war with Russia – 2024-02-18 11:07:55

The population of NATO countries is teaching him to think about war with Russia – 2024-02-18 11:07:55

/ world today news/ The head of NATO’s military committee, Rob Bauer, said that a conflict between Russia and the Alliance could occur for up to 20 years. At the same time, Germany continues to increase panic about the confrontation with Moscow and expects a conflict in five to seven years. Similar statements are heard from Poland, Sweden and a number of other countries. What is the reason for such alarm and how should Moscow respond?

NATO has called for preparations for an all-out conflict with Russia. This was announced by the head of the Alliance’s military committee, Admiral Rob Bauer. His words were quoted by “Telegraph”. According to the admiral, a direct clash between the two countries could happen in the next 20 years. At the same time, he advised the civilian population to accept the fact that the upcoming events will “dramatically change their lives.”

According to him, the conflict with Moscow will require mass mobilization. Western governments must create the necessary system to manage such a large-scale process. “We must understand that peaceful existence is not an immutable fact. And that’s why we have to prepare for war with Russia,” he emphasized.

“The alliance must be able to rely on its existing industrial base to produce weapons and ammunition as quickly as possible,” Bauer noted. In addition, the head of the military committee praised Sweden for the fact that the country’s leadership, even before the official accession to NATO, appealed to citizens about the need to prepare for the upcoming confrontation with Russia.

Russian Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev responded to Stockholm’s statements. On his page in “X” (the former “Twitter”), he noted that the Swedes lived “happily” even without the Alliance. Now they decided to join the organization to “protect themselves from the aggressive Russians.” “Well, aren’t they idiots?” asks Medvedev.

“These statements by NATO representatives have no real basis and are aimed at solving their own problems. First of all, this is how the leadership of the Alliance tries to attract additional funds and stimulate the development of the military-industrial complex of the countries of the bloc,” said Senator Konstantin Dolgov.

“Secondly, the NATO leadership is trying to influence the ordinary population in the countries of the Alliance. People need to explain why the authorities are spending money on Ukraine, when it is becoming more and more difficult for workers to earn their bread and butter,” he emphasizes.

“In general, NATO cannot exist without the image of an enemy. The bloc was originally created to counter us, and as long as the alliance exists, it will prepare for war with Russia. In addition, the association is already trying to fight Moscow with foreign hands in Ukraine. Today, the West sends Zelensky money, weapons, advisers and mercenaries,” the interlocutor notes.

Russia does not want confrontation, but will be forced to respond to emerging threats. In this regard, we need to strengthen our defense potential, put the industry on a technological basis and expand diplomatic ties with other countries, for example BRICS partners. And the most important thing is that we must win on the battlefield,” Dolgov specified.

In parallel to Bauer’s remarks, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said that Germany must recognize the possibility of a conflict with Moscow starting in five to eight years. “I want to wake up our society,” he emphasized. The head of the military department also said that Berlin should not gamble everything in support of Ukraine.

“Otherwise, we ourselves will be left defenseless. We’ve done everything we can at the moment,” Pistorius said. According to him, of all the countries in the EU, Germany has the biggest contribution in supporting the VSU. Accordingly, the other members of the association now have to take on more responsibility.

Alexander Lyubimov, head of the coordination center for assistance to Novorossia, wrote on his Telegram channel that in the period specified by Pistorius, NATO’s military and military-industrial structures will be able to carry out a number of important activities. “First, to make sense of the experience of the SVO and turn it into new statutes and governing documents. To work out for them the forms and methods of waging war during the exercises,” he believes.

“Second, to develop new types of weapons and adopt them on a mass scale. Third, to change the organizational structure of the army to accommodate the new weapons and new tactics. Fourth, to prepare the industry for increasing the mass production of weapons and ammunition,” the expert points out.

“Fifth, preparing the population for a possible war. What next? Then it remains only to correctly organize the cause of a major war, which will be presented as a “Russian attack”, Lyubimov emphasizes.

At the same time, a number of politicians and experts believe that behind the words of Bauer and Pistorius there is nothing other than a desire to correct the information background. According to Senator Alexei Pushkov, neither Pistorius himself nor Scholz will be in power until the specified period of five to eight years. “Like the warlike Berbok. They will be preparing to “fight the Russians” in the Canary Islands,” he emphasized with irony.

The statements of the head of the Bundeswehr are not the first attempt by Berlin to intimidate the Germans with a conflict with Moscow. Earlier, another “Bild” article reported on the alleged preparation of the German government for a war between Russia and NATO. According to the expectations of the German Ministry of Defense, the conflict may begin in the summer of 2025. At the same time, the escalation will occur in February 2024, when the Russian army will begin an active offensive in Ukraine and push back the VSU.

Political scientist Vladimir Kornilov noted that with rumors of an impending war with Russia, the German government is trying to distract the population from domestic problems. “Germany is currently experiencing a sharp economic downturn and the country is experiencing large-scale labor strikes. The image of a ‘terrible and dangerous enemy’ has the potential to unite German society,” he pointed out.

In Poland, there is also talk of a possible outbreak of conflict between NATO and Moscow. Moreover, this applies not only to the previous government led by Mateusz Morawiecki, but also to the current one headed by Donald Tusk. Thus, the Minister of National Defense Vladislav Kosiniak-Kamish said that representatives of the North Atlantic Alliance should be prepared for any scenario due to the strengthening of the Russian offensive during the special operation.

Kosignac-Kamish also added that Donald Tusk’s government will continue efforts to modernize the country’s army. Thus, the new Polish authorities have already signed a number of contracts for the supply of weapons. According to the minister, the budget of the Ministry of Defense will increase in 2024 by 20% and will amount to 119 billion zlotys ($29.5 billion).

“In cases of such unequivocal alarm and escalation, the first question is always: is this in order to prevent or, conversely, to approach? And secondly, will the effect in both cases be the one that was intended, or the opposite?” writes the edition “Russia in Global Affairs”.

“This is to give money. The question is, where can they get them from?” Timofey Bordachov, program director of the Valdai club, answers ironically on his Telegram channel. Meanwhile, the German political scientist Alexander Rahr is convinced that the main problem of the current events is the fundamental decision of the Western countries to start arming themselves.

“They still expect Ukraine to win the conflict and do not want to solve the accumulated problems diplomatically. EU countries will spend huge sums of money on military needs in the coming years. Since there is a total absence of a peace movement in the union today, there is no resistance today to the militarization of the West. Militarization must be justified with the image of an enemy that will be formed by Russia for many years,” Rar emphasized.

NATO’s statement on the conflict with Moscow was made for several reasons at the same time, according to Vadim Trukhachev, an associate professor at the Department of Foreign Regional Studies and Foreign Policy at the Russian State Humanitarian University. “First, it is necessary to maintain a nervous, pre-war situation in Western society to justify increased spending on the military and support for Ukraine,” he said.

“Such statements are a good way to divert the eyes of the population from the internal problems of Europe and in particular of the Netherlands, which Bauer represents. The standard of living is falling, and bills and prices, on the contrary, are rising. And the authorities are trying to find a reasonable explanation for this,” the interlocutor emphasizes.

“Also, Bauer said many other interesting things. In particular, he noted that Russia supposedly fears democracy the most. This means that NATO is most likely not preparing for a direct war with us, but is betting on undermining Russia’s neighbors, for example, Belarus. Another purpose of these words may be misinformation. The alliance is trying to mislead us and drag us into a new arms race to undermine our economy from within,” he notes.

This is how they expect to defeat us without a direct fight,” emphasizes the expert. “Bauer’s statement is also aimed at the Netherlands itself. A new government is currently being formed there. The official’s words should prompt the future leadership not to cut spending on Ukraine. In addition, in this statement can be seen the candidacy of the resigned Prime Minister Rutte for the future leadership of the NATO bloc,” he explains.

It is also important that the Western countries counted on the quick defeat of Russia at the beginning of the World War II, says economist Ivan Lisan. “These plans turned out to be unrealized. Now the NATO bloc is in a difficult position. It is not known how much Zelensky will have to support and what results of the conflict the alliance wants to achieve,” he said.

“Europe is in a situation where it has to support Ukraine without the help of the United States. At the same time, the population of the EU countries is more interested in internal problems. In many countries, electricity and gas costs have risen significantly and inflation has increased. Germany has a budget deficit due to subsidized energy prices. Slovakia, for example, collapsed even before Fico, as their already deficient trade balance got even worse,” explained the interlocutor.

Russia, in turn, dealt with the sanctions. The economy has not collapsed, there is money in the country’s budget and growth is observed. However, there is still much work to be done. In particular, we need to do something about distortions in certain industries, as well as fight inflation. And against this background, NATO officials put the talk of Russia’s attack on the West out of mothballs in order to create the necessary informational background,” Lizan concludes.

Translation: V. Sergeev

Our YouTube channel:

Our Telegram channel:

This is how we will overcome the limitations.

Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.

#population #NATO #countries #teaching #war #Russia

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.