The daughter-in-law brings up the child in complete permissiveness, says that this is how the formation of personality takes place more correctly.
True, through the experiment it was possible to find out that permissiveness applies to everything except the things of the daughter-in-law herself. Here she cut through some dictatorial inclinations.
I didn’t like my daughter-in-law even before my grandson appeared. She has a wind in her head, and her ideas about life are as if she came from another planet.
She ate some kind of germinated seeds, enlightened herself, persuaded her son to go to India on some kind of pilgrimage, or just a strange journey.
There she became pregnant. And I so hoped that the son would take a closer look at the fool of his wife and divorce her without any problems. But he didn’t.
Of course, on the one hand, he himself is to blame, it was necessary to look at who you marry, but on the other hand, a man fell in love, did not see any cons, and now his conscience does not allow him to leave a woman with a child.
I hoped that the birth of a child would somehow land our shebutnaya, but it seems to me that she completely moved her head. When her grandson was one year old, she announced that her child would be a vegetarian.
I had to threaten custody, divorce and court so that she would come to her senses a little and start listening to what the doctors were saying, and not the cockroaches in her head.
It seems that the brains fell into place, and vaccinations began to be done without scandals, and the child ate normally, and not any grass. But there was a problem with education.
“The child himself intuitively feels when and how to explore the world,” the daughter-in-law said.
That is, they didn’t have any daily routine, they fed the child, when God put it on their souls, they went to bed too, they got up almost at lunchtime.
Somehow the child was taught to walk, eat with a spoon, ask for a potty. And this was not done by the forces of the daughter-in-law, my son and the matchmakers suffered. The daughter-in-law only repeated that everything will come in due time.
There was also no question of explaining to the child what can and cannot be done. Here, even we could not fix something, because the daughter-in-law threw herself like a kite and yelled that she had her own method of education, some kind of Japanese, in which a child cannot be scolded and something forbidden to him.
Recently, my grandson broke a vase at my house, and he was already four years old, he understood everything, he just pushed it off the table and watched the reaction of adults.
I remove the fragments, and the daughter-in-law was sitting on the phone, and sitting. You, I say, can tell the child something, explain that you can’t do this.
– Can I beat him half to death because of your vase? – the daughter-in-law immediately began to yell. And again a long monologue about the fact that a child learns the world in this way, and she will not forbid or scold him until she is six years old.
Retribution came two weeks after that conversation. Gathered at the matchmakers on the occasion of the matchmaker’s birthday. The son, daughter-in-law and grandson were also, of course.
In the middle of the feast, the wild cries of the daughter-in-law and the roar of the grandson began to be heard from the corridor. Everyone ran there, it is not clear what happened there.
But nothing special. It’s just that the grandson got to his mother’s purse and painted her new sneakers with lipstick. They were white, they became crimson.
And the daughter-in-law was screaming so hard that her ears were blocked. She lifted her grandson, slapped him several times, continuing to yell and not paying attention to his tears.
The son intervened, took the child, roared something to his missus, took his grandson to calm down. And the daughter-in-law is standing, her eyes are filled with blood.
I couldn’t keep silent, and I didn’t want to, to be honest. And how, I say, does this picture correlate with the fact that a child under six years old cannot be scolded or punished, and there are no prohibitions for him?
The daughter-in-law looked at me, only opened her mouth, but then the matchmaker almost took her away by the ear and very convincingly explained something to her daughter. Apparently, her manners also began to enrage the matchmaker.
And I still hope that the son will find an adequate wife for himself and will be able to sue this half-witted son. The matchmakers, of course, are good, but their daughter didn’t get it right. Although, maybe they will re-educate again.
In the section “Opinion of readers” materials from readers are published.
