The New York Times wants Kamala Harris elected

New York. The “New York Times” expresses the opinion of the editorial team before every election in the United States – the newspaper usually supports the Democrats. This year, the longtime newspaper made a serious case for Democratic presidential candidate and Vice President Kamala Harris. The 59-year-old’s vote was the only “patriotic decision the presidency could have,” said the opinion piece published by the editorial team. released on Monday (local time)..

Trump is “morally unacceptable”

It is difficult to think of a candidate who is less worthy of the position of President of the United States than Donald Trump, the journalists wrote. “He has proven himself morally unfit for a role that requires its holder to put the good of the country above self-interest.” His temperament proved unfit for a role that required just the qualities—wisdom, honesty, sympathy, courage, reserve, humility, discipline—that most lacked.

In addition to these disqualifying factors are his numerous criminal charges, his increasing age, his basic lack of interest in politics and his increasingly awkward staff.

A newspaper also criticizes Harris

Many voters would like more information about the vice president’s plans and also more unscripted meetings in which she explains her vision and policies, the journalists said. “You’re right to ask about it,” she said.

Given the risks involved in this election, Harris may think she can run a campaign to reduce the risk of inadvertent mistakes. Finally, answering journalists’ questions and providing more detailed political information could cause controversy. In their eyes, it may be enough to be the only viable alternative to Trump. “This strategy may ultimately be successful, but it is a disservice to the American people and their own bottom line,” the newspaper said.

Despite this criticism, the verdict was ultimately clear – although Harris may not be “the perfect candidate for every voter,” especially those who are “difficult and angry” about the government’s inability to “fix the broken things”. “Nonetheless, we urge Americans to compare Ms. Harris’ record with that of her opponent,” the newspaper wrote. “Ms. Harris is more than a necessary alternative .”

RND/chapter