The 4-2 at Celtic is in many ways misleading and in others significant. Misleading, because taking the field with the belief that everything is easy is an unforgivable mistake and in the first quarter of an hour it could have been 0-3 (and then at 3-2 Donnarumma makes a miracle). Significant because it certifies once more character, self-esteem and conviction that make possible – on certain occasions – enterprises that seem out of reach. Just don’t get used to it …
Shock start for the Rossoneri, in total replacement. Krunic misses a check to the limit and 0-1 is born. Then the great Donnarumma parade. Kjaer gets hurt after another chance for Celtic who doubles immediately. Not even a quarter of an hour and 0-2 … The team struggles to shake, continues to flounder for a few minutes, but a free-kick from Calhanoglu from the limit to 24 ‘reopens the games and only 2’ later comes the same: Castillejo turns left in the middle of an assist from Rebic. Not even half an hour and 4 goals.
The second half begins with the splendid 3-2 of the man of the match, Hauge, and the road is (dangerously) downhill, in the sense that an excellent organization of the game is followed by sufficient errors to be avoided at any cost. The usual Brahim Diaz tweets: “Mission accomplished” closes, but these lessons must serve to grow and mature.
In the “Fatto Quotidiano” of December 3, Gianni Barbacetto discovers and describes – after years of talking about it – the operation relating to the new stadium in Milan: “(…) The great (private) real estate speculation on (public) land that will make thousands of square meters of buildings, towers, skyscrapers, hotels and commercial spaces grow (…). Paolo Scaroni will go down in history as the one that covers and pushes the most confusing, dangerous and less transparent of the financial operations underway in Milan The San Siro stadium operation is, first of all, a gigantic fraud: with the excuse of the stadium (the “excuse” of the stadium ??? For Inter and Milan the stadium is an “excuse” ??? My personal note), Milan and Inter are trying to carry out a colossal real estate operation (operation or speculation? My personal note) “. The acute, disinterested analysis then raises the key doubt of the question, an unavoidable, physiological question: who benefits? “What the public benefit is, apart from about fifty million in urbanization charges (…)”. Yeah, what rich public administration could “fifty million” ever be interested in? Small change. And then, really, where would the public benefits be in 180,000 m2 of commercial space, 66,000 m2 of offices, 15,000 m2 of hotels, 13,000 m2 of entertainment, 5,000 m2 of fitness space, 4,000 m2 of space for congress centers …? “Where would the public benefit be”, Barbacetto asks indignantly, describing the little Dubai that Milan and Inter have in mind, without making the slightest hint of the repercussions it could have on trade, on jobs, on the further development of the economic capital of Italy, as well as of the two football clubs … Thus, in the end, the colleague of the “Fatto Quotidiano” finds a third definition for the new stadium: “The most anonymous and secret of financial transactions”, left in the hands of companies “whose owners are unknown”.
With a thorough investigation, someone woke up from hibernation one morning under the snow in December 2020, 4 and a half years after Suning and 3 and a half years after the Elliott Fund (which he brusquely defines as “vulture”) asking vigorously: “Who are they the owners of Milan and Inter? ” only to answer clearly at the end of the scrupulous investigation (only in relation to Milan, because it should have been clarified that Suning has been listed on the stock exchange for 16 years). And then: “Tell us Scaroni who the board members are Cerchione and D’Avanzo (the two who, according to” Report “, are the real owners of Milan … Report and Barbacetto, come to an agreement: owners or board members? My personal note) “, ending with an extraordinary flight that takes us … Guess where the” Fatto Quotidiano “takes us, starting from San Siro to get to Arcore? Et voilà: “They had as partners Giuseppe Cipriani (…), the ex-partner of Nicole Minetti (…) coordinator of the girls of the bunga-bunga”.
Here falls the fact, in a broad sense, in short, the question: falls on Nicole Minetti. Biscardi would have called him “the sgup”.
Of Pallotta, Saputo, Commisso, Tacopina, Friedkin is always screwed and gives less than zero to analysts, newspapers, specialized and non-specialized magazines, assault TV programs, insights. To the limit even Suning doesn’t give a damn: what do you want, all people landed in Serie A from the remote rest of the world, only for love and passion …
That “Milan and Inter” is smoke and mirrors: it was only Milan, which was of interest. Because it was Nicole Minetti who was interested. For this reason, all that poop of the stadium (200 million in annual revenues each for Inter and Milan, according to the estimate), of the shopping center, of small Dubai … is just a scam, a mere speculation, a dark and suspicious maneuver. A shame! But what a Milanese pride … It’s a shame! Why should a fool like Arnault be attracted to him or simply tickled?
“Dal bunga-bunga al magna-magna”, this could be a good title for the article. But he would have made us discover the tasty finish immediately and instead so we could enjoy all that journey in the dark world of Milanese building speculation. No, in the dark world of Milanese football. No, on the contrary, in the dark world of Milan. No, no, on the contrary, in the dark world of bunga-bunga. In short, Berlusconi.
Now everything is clear and finally there is really nothing dark anymore.
–
