Former MP Ziad Soud took to Twitter to express his dissatisfaction with the head of the Free Patriotic Movement, MP Gebran Bassil, without directly naming him. In a fiery tweet, Soud stated that the new cosmic theory, which represents Bassil’s ideology, has lost popularity due to its failure to meet the interests of the people.
Soud emphasized the importance of fulfilling one’s duty towards the people, stating that those who do so will not lose their support. However, he accused Bassil of tempting people with promises that do not align with their interests, resulting in their loss of trust and support.
The former MP further criticized Bassil, stating that he alone bears the responsibility for the decline in popularity of the cosmic theory. Soud ended his tweet with a sarcastic remark, questioning whether Bassil’s group requires the use of the anti-anxiety medication, Xanax.
The tweet has sparked a heated debate on social media, with supporters and critics of both Soud and Bassil expressing their opinions. Some praised Soud for speaking out against what they perceive as empty promises, while others defended Bassil and his political agenda.
It remains to be seen how this public exchange will impact the political landscape and the popularity of the Free Patriotic Movement. As tensions rise, it is clear that the divide between Soud and Bassil’s supporters is deepening, and the future of the cosmic theory hangs in the balance.
What are the potential consequences of the deepening divide between supporters of Ziad Soud and Gebran Bassil for the future of the cosmic theory and the political landscape
Former MP Ziad Soud recently took to Twitter to express his discontent with the leader of the Free Patriotic Movement, MP Gebran Bassil, without explicitly mentioning him. In a passionate tweet, Soud voiced his concerns about the declining popularity of what he referred to as the “cosmic theory,” which symbolizes Bassil’s ideology. According to Soud, this decline is a result of the theory’s failure to serve the best interests of the people.
Soud emphasized the importance of fulfilling one’s duties towards the people, stating that those who do so will not lose their support. However, he accused Bassil of captivating people with promises that do not align with their interests, ultimately leading to a loss of trust and support.
Furthermore, Soud directly criticized Bassil, claiming that he alone bears responsibility for the waning popularity of the cosmic theory. Soud concluded his tweet with a sarcastic remark, questioning whether Bassil’s group relies on the use of the anti-anxiety medication, Xanax.
This tweet has sparked a fervent debate on social media, with both supporters and critics of Soud and Bassil sharing their opinions. Some have commended Soud for speaking out against what they perceive as empty promises, while others have rallied behind Bassil and his political agenda.
The impact of this public exchange on the political landscape and the popularity of the Free Patriotic Movement remains to be seen. As tensions continue to escalate, it is evident that the divide between supporters of Soud and Bassil is deepening, with the future of the cosmic theory hanging in the balance.
