The Ministry of the Presidency information an enchantment towards the accusations of the TEPFJ

Mexico Metropolis. In response to what it described as false allegations imputed to President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, relating to the improper use of social applications and the coercion of the vote, by the Specialised Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Department of the Federation, the Authorized Counsel of the Federal Govt filed an enchantment earlier than the Superior Chamber to overview the decision authorized by the primary occasion.

“With an evident lack of arguments and with none proof, the Specialised Regional Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Department of the Federation (TEPJF) falsely claims that there’s improper use of social applications and coercion to vote by the pinnacle of the Federal Govt Department. The electoral magistrates fail to assist, with goal parts, how a easy expression interprets into coercion of greater than 35 million individuals who voted in favor of constant the transformation of our nation.”

In taking a place on the efficiency of judges Luis Espíndola, Ruben Lara and Mónica Lozano, who thought of that López Obrador’s statements made throughout the conferences on Could 9 and 11 had been a component of stress on the citizens to induce voting, the Council criticized the road of argument through which they affiliate the validity or advantages of social applications with a specific political possibility successful the electoral course of, which is clearly false.

For the Authorized Division, the statements included within the decision “are so basic and banal that Decide Lara Patrón himself deviated from the explanations said” however voted in favor.

The Authorized Advisory Workplace of the Federal Govt filed an enchantment for the Superior Chamber of the TEPJF to research the details once more and revoke the sentence for missing the minimal parts of justification and motivation, for which a brand new name is made to the electoral magistrates in order that their resolutions are based mostly on proof, and never on private assumptions.