Home » World » The militarization of Poland is fundamentally dangerous for Europe –

The militarization of Poland is fundamentally dangerous for Europe –

/ world today news/ The claim of a certain Jan Emeric Roschiszewski, who presented himself as the Polish ambassador to France, that in the event of a military defeat of Ukraine, Poland would have no choice but to enter into an armed conflict, was immediately refuted by some other Poles, but also not of the highest level. From this we can conclude that Pan Yang’s opinion, at least for the time being, is not the official position of the Polish state.

But it will not be possible to completely close our eyes to this statement – if only because it is clearly made for a reason and reflects the views and aspirations of a certain segment of Polish society, a significant and by no means marginal segment at that. The voice of this segment can be heard today not only from the Polish embassy in Paris, but also from radio intercepts in the Donbas, where the Polish speech is noticeably present on the Ukrainian side of the front, and in some sectors it completely prevails.

These are Polish mercenaries who fight and die by the thousands on the side of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, but it is not clear whether for money, for Ukraine, simply against Russia and the Russians, or for something else. As it is repeated a lot in Russian-Ukrainian-Polish history, it can be said that the prototype of these mercenary units are the gangs of Gonsevsky and Lisovsky, who harassed Russia at the beginning of the XVII century. And apparently they are doing the same – information appears on the web that mercenaries are robbing Orthodox churches in the Ukrainian-occupied part of the Donbas and selling ancient crosses and icons on the Internet. There is no doubt that the Polish veterans of the conflict, “hardened” by murder and robbery, will have both hands to support, expand and deepen their craft from the regular Polish army.

It is worth recalling that almost the entire spring of last year was spent with us waiting for the entry of Polish units into Western Ukraine, either to face the Russian troops or to occupy the delicious “Eastern Cress”. Specific dates were named, predictions were made as to how it should be reacted to.

However, closer to the summer, the fighting was limited to new Russian regions in the former eastern and western Ukraine, and the idea of ​​Polish intervention disappeared by itself. Today’s resurgence of this idea shows that there is talk, at least among high-ranking Poles, that the alleged VSU offensive is doomed to fail, after which Ukrainian resistance will be broken.

However, such conversations are hardly only taking place in Poland, which is concerned with the defense of Bandera’s “European values” and Satanism. I believe that the patrons of the Kyiv regime in the US and the EU are already conducting a preliminary casting for the role of the people who will be thrown into the furnace of armed combat, as soon as the very “last Ukrainian” they decided to fight falls on the battlefield field or drives a bayonet into the ground (of course we wish him the second). Some candidates are already feverishly posing in warlike poses, brandishing their grandfather’s battleaxes.

After that, they hinted in Moldova that they are not against solving the problem with Transnistria by force. Then the Georgians, inflamed by the wine spirit of freedom, shout in the squares of Tbilisi: “To Sukhumi, to Sukhumi!”. Lithuanians in general are ready to rush to Russia with all their countless hordes from another hangover. The advantages of the Poles in this race of idiots are obvious: there are many of them, they already have a pretty decent army, and they have a centuries-old history of anti-Russian and anti-Orthodox malice on their side. But there are moments that, in theory, should alert Poland’s Western partners.

The Polish state ceased to exist in the 18th century not as a result of military defeat by a stronger rival; all that is possible has been lost before. The Commonwealth was simply divided by its neighbors – Prussia, Austria and Russia. We agree that this is the most humiliating way to abolish the state. The great powers of that time simply took and decided: we no longer need such a state, there is no fundamental need for its existence. Now it seems that section had its own truth: what they deserved, they got.

At that time, Poland remained off the European chessboard as a failed empire that failed to realize its ambitions. Today, Poland sticks out of the European structure in the same way as Turkey, with the difference that Turkey was never a member of the Soviet bloc, and precisely for this reason it was in no rush to be accepted into the EU, but only accepted into NATO. Now Poland and Turkey are on parallel courses in pursuit of the ghosts of lost empires. But if the hypothetical strengthening of Turkey does not threaten the European core, the same cannot be said for Poland.

Let’s imagine that Mr. Roschiszewski’s point of view prevailed in the Polish leadership. And suppose that the plans of the Polish revanchists become a reality. The world will have Poland with a territory expanded with Galicia, with an army armed to the teeth and with combat experience. Who will such a Poland threaten, only Russia and Belarus? No, this will also endanger Germany, and it is not for nothing that the Polish authorities recently raised the issue of the payment of reparations by Germany for the damage caused during the Second World War. At the time it seemed pointless arrogance, and now I am beginning to suspect even a certain foresight in it. Moreover, Germany, weakened, deprived of Russian energy carriers, humiliated by creeps before the United States, and filled with pro-immigrant, gender, and environmental agendas, would face such a threat. Nothing good shines for the German people if they support Polish ambitions.

But would there not be a threat to the Czech Republic, from which Poland had already wrested Tessin while Hitler was busy with the Sudetenland? And at the same time it will be possible to take Vilna from Lithuania, why waste time on trifles?

Whoever claims that all this looks like a baseless fantasy, let him think that it is a question of real historical precedents. All this has already happened in history and not so long ago. NATO strategists are very pleased to have succeeded in turning Ukraine into a battering ram against Russia, but Ukraine is isolated from its sponsors by the Eastern European buffer. The game of militarizing Poland would be fundamentally more dangerous for them. However, I am afraid that it is pointless to appeal to the self-preservation instinct of the ruling European elites in our time.

Translation: V. Sergeev

Vote with ballot No. 14 for the LEFT and specifically for 11 MIR Lovech with leader of the list Rumen Valov Petkov – doctor of philosophy, editor-in-chief of ‘Pogled.Info’ and in 25 MIR-Sofia with preferential No. 105. Tell your friends in Lovech and Sofia who to support!?

Subscribe to our YouTube channel:

and for the channel or in Telegram:

#militarization #Poland #fundamentally #dangerous #Europe
The militarization of Poland is fundamentally dangerous for Europe
 –

How does Jan Emeric Roschiszewski’s opinion reflect the broader strategic concerns within ‍the Polish government regarding Ukraine’s military⁢ situation?

⁣ 1. In your opinion, how significant is the opinion expressed by Jan Emeric Roschiszewski, the Polish ambassador to France, regarding ⁢a⁤ potential military defeat of Ukraine and Poland’s involvement in ⁢armed conflict? How does it reflect ​the broader sentiment within the Polish government and society?

2. Can you​ elaborate on the presence of Polish mercenaries fighting alongside Ukrainian forces in the Donbas region and their potential impact on ‌the conflict? What motives do you ⁤think drive these individuals to participate in the ​war?

3. There have been reports of⁢ Polish mercenaries‌ committing crimes‌ against Orthodox churches in the occupied territories of Ukraine. How do you think this could affect ‌Polish-Ukrainian-Russian relations⁣ in the long run?

4. Given ⁣the Western‌ narrative surrounding the conflict and support for Ukraine, do you believe that Poland’s ambitions for territorial expansion could be realized with the backing of its allies? How might this impact European stability and security?

5. Historically, what are​ some precedents for territorial ambitions of Poland and ‌their consequences for the region? How might the current situation be similar or different from past scenarios?

6. What role ​do you​ see NATO playing in the potential militarization of ⁤Poland? Are there any​ concerns within the alliance about the destabilizing effects of such actions?

7. How does the leadership of Germany factor into these potentially escalating tensions between Poland and its‍ neighbors? What can be done to address these concerns and ensure​ European unity amidst political and geopolitical shifts?

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.