Despite the fact that independent international observers have confirmed and revealed that the elections that took place in Venezuela were exemplary, the establishment insists on wanting to stigmatize the Bolivarian country, through notes that seek to put the electoral process in that country under suspicion.
It is really unfortunate how some groups believe they are owners of the world and want to impose their worldview, although for this they harm millions of people, as is the case of the Venezuelan population, which, for years, has been sacrificed by the arrogance of those who do not support the contest, the courage and the confrontation of a government and a people that do not accept subjugation.
Washington lackeys
The first issue that we must emphasize is the fact that, as a sovereign country, the presence of international observers in Venezuelan territory to monitor the electoral process is an outrage. Regardless of any problem, neither the European Union nor the United States or the United Kingdom should meddle in the internal affairs of any sovereign state.
The Venezuelan people are not incapable, they do not need tutelage and, therefore, the mere presence of observers already demonstrates a high degree of arrogance, of a superiority complex of the North over the South. But, of course, we understand why this happens, since the Anglo-Saxon people have always seen themselves as “better”, as the one who is about to “lead civilization to barbarism.”
Lackeys from Washington, Brussels and London have the mission of creating / disseminating narratives that question the legitimacy of the electoral processes carried out in Venezuelan territory, in order to legitimize the reproach directed at the Maduro administration (they used to do the same with Hugo Chávez), because, despite the attempts, the coups they helped carry out did not have the desired effects (see 2002 and more recently, the recognition of Guaidó as president).
Despite all the attempts to overthrow a legitimately elected government, Maduro resists and showed, in the last elections, that the opposition does not have the strength to remove him from power through the ballot box. The electoral results prove it. The independent observers who were in that country on the 21st, unlike the Commission sent by the EU, found no irregularities; on the contrary, they praised the process, especially the behavior of the National Electoral Council (CNE).
Anjuli Tostes Faria Melo, international observer for the Brazilian Association of Jurists for Democracy, stated that “electoral guarantees were fully and transparently fulfilled.” Furthermore, the opposition itself admitted its incompetence, through Capriles, who attributed the defeat of the opposition bloc to “lack of unity.”
Therefore, the narratives of Brussels and London show that the intention is, in reality, to continue destabilizing the South American country, appropriating more than a billion dollars in Venezuelan gold that are in the English Bank (the British central bank); or even supporting an “illegal and illegitimate ruler”, like Juan Guaidó who, with the false argument that he wants to liberate the people of Venezuela from a supposed “tyranny”, appropriates public resources from the Venezuelan State without any kind of surveillance. and / or inspection, since it is at the service of the United States.
Meanwhile, the governments of Chile and Colombia, for example, are committing atrocities against sectors of the opposition that are demonstrating. In Colombia, several murders have even victimized social leaders who work for peace, land recovery and human rights. While that happens, we do not see actions from Brussels and London. This is logical, because Duque is an ally of Washington.
–
