From 51.6% against 48.4% in favor of the request for disclosure of the effects of the commission for new investigations and the minutes of the assembly
–
The Kookmin University School Association voted for or towards whether or not to self-confirm Ms. Kim Kun-hee’s doctoral thesis, which is the issue of controversy more than plagiarism.
On the 19th, the Kookmin University College Association introduced the effects of the vote for and versus, inquiring whether to need the disclosure of the report and the minutes of the re-investigation committee assembly of the Investigate Ethics Committee for the doctoral dissertation of the wife of President Yoon Seok. -yeol, Kim Kun-hee and no matter whether to perform self-assessment through the college assessment committee.
Following the amazing standard assembly of the 12th, the professors’ buy voted for and against the verification of Ms. Kim’s thesis for all instructors from 4 to 6 pm on the same day.
The vote was attended by 314 teachers out of 407.
Pursuing the vote, 61.5% (193 people today) opposed the development of a committee to self-test the document and 38.5% (121 persons) supported it, showing a bigger opposition amount.
As a end result, the Kookmin University Faculty Association’s attempt to validate Kim’s doctoral thesis was ultimately rejected.
In situation of self-test, 57.4% (105 people today) out of 183 individuals excluding non-respondents replied that only the doctoral thesis really should be checked in a separate concern that determines the scope of the thesis to be checked.
The remaining 42.6% (78 folks) supported the see that all four files verified by the Audit Committee of the Kookmin College Exploration Ethics Committee really should be re-confirmed.
On the dilemma of the ask for for disclosure of the findings of the Kookmin University Exploration Ethics Committee re-investigation committee and the minutes of the assembly, there was a slight variance among pros and cons.
A overall of 51.6% (162 individuals) opposed it and 48.4% (152 folks) supported it.
To the question of analyzing the quorum for this vote, 56.7% (178 folks) replied that it should really be created as a ‘main agenda’, which is determined by a the vast majority of two-thirds or more with extra than the fifty percent of the members.
The remaining 43.3% (136 people) deemed it acceptable to treat it as a “common agenda” decided by a bulk of those present and a greater part in favor.
The College Council explained: “No matter which course our conclusion is, it is the result of the collective intelligence of the college. He said.
On the other hand, it was confirmed that the day right before the vote, Lee Seok-hwan, Vice President of College Administration, and Lee Dong-gi, Dean of the Faculty of Legislation, emailed all instructors asking queries about the vote itself.
Some pointed out that these emails could have pressured the professors to convey their views.
/ yunhap information
–
