Christmas archived. Good intentions too. Take the federal president, Gravina. One said to himself: after Christmas he will speak. Perhaps: with Gravina, the hypothesis is always prevalent. In fact: after days of silence Gravina Gabriele allowed himself to a Capitoline newspaper explaining “nothing”. What did Gravina say? Nothing. Count Zio, in comparison, was an amateur. Other than “soothe and soothe”. Here we are at the Max Stirner of “The only one and his property“. Stirner explains: “I made my cause out of nothing“. Stirner was Schmidt’s pseudonym: German philosopher adopted by nihilists. He explained (?) Gravina that his is a role of “impartiality”. That the judges of the Federation are “good, conscientious and prepared”. That he Prince (not of Salina) of the Leopards has the duty to be “third”. To the dismay of a federal president who did not appear to support the position of his judges, prejudicing the eventual appeal for the Coni ruling, the (non) amazement of a man who acts as a political unscrupulous has taken over.
“Dolo preordained” wrote the appeal judge Piero Sandulli. Words spoken by someone who does not have (unlike others) “skeletons in the closet“. Sandulli was a member of the Calciopoli board of judges.
Sandulli, before verifying the goodness of his colleague Mastrandrea’s investigations, had explained that “the ranking should not be written by Covid”. It was not Sandulli, ill-disposed towards Napoli. But along the way, something must have made him change his mind. A small thing: a fraud. Conceived “before”. Not even at the table: at the table. Because then always there you go to parry: in some fractino. But if Gravina is Manzoni, the rest of the bandwagon swallowed the bruised apple without a word. It is not surprising that Juventus did not object as a “party to the dispute”. Basisce did not speak the Precious, the Marotta: all those who respecting the protocol signed by the Government, the Federation and the League (De Laurentiis must have signed without his knowledge) have also received the mockery of the president of Naples.
“We always respect the rules”.
This is why Mario Draghi must have phoned Aurelio de Laurentiis. To compliment: for compliance with the rules. Is the country in the guano? Mario Draghi is invoked as savior of the country in place of Giuseppe Conte? Piano: Mario Draghi seems to have other (priority?) Thoughts. Word of don Aurelio.
It is surprising that Malagò did not speak like Spadafora. Even if “amazement” appears a reckless noun. It is surprising Sandulli has not yet spoken. It is surprising that he has not yet resigned.
I can’t think that someone in Sandulli’s position doesn’t feel the duty to resign. Coni told him that he took “the longest step”. Translated: that he has the wrong job. Its president did not spend a word to defend him. He said generically that the Federation judges are “good and scrupulous”. Those “professional and scrupulous” judges had written of “premeditated malice”. Therefore ? Has anyone put pressure on the Coni? On the Federation? On the League? Is the opinion of an ASL (friend of a friend) worth the credibility of Italian football? And those who had “complied”? All suckers? “Who has had, had”, etc.?
And now? Scurdammoce ‘or’ past ?. I don’t believe who, has “given, given, given“. They won’t forget. Card wins, card loses. For Gravina it is never “time”. Never.
The incredible thing is that everyone is asking to have faith in football. Tertullian explained: “Credo quia absurdum”. I think because it is absurd. Tertullian loved paradoxes.
The thing (credible is that in Florence, Andrea Agnelli met with Aurelio De Laurentiis (and others) to talk about television rights. And as a good reporter explained “maybe to ease the tensions”. Maybe by agreeing (“aumma aumma ? “) For the date of the” recovery “of the match? Nobody thinks badly: those who write well, write that on these occasions the governance of football is discussed. Translated: change (also) the rules in the race. Activities in which the FIGC is specialized. Because it is clear that the rules will have to be changed. Who explains it to them, now to Company X or to Company Y who may have to be saved, who must not “do as Napoli” for the good of Italian football? Il Conte Zio , will he protect himself with the Cardinal’s blessing? Will he protect himself. For the blessing: in another life. That is called Spada-fora. Verify the genesis of the surname.
Andrea Agnelli could now complete the work. By writing a decent check to De Laurentiis for the Llorente or Milik card. Or maybe (imitating Tafazzi) accepting the date of January 13 for the recovery.
A friend asked me: “But you weren’t in favor of playing that game?”. Sure: I still am. But I hate the smart ones: “Dolo preordained“.
Read in “Bertoldo e Bertoldino” by Giulio Cesare Croce: “He is not deceived if not those who trust”. Collateral story: true Dr. Sandulli?
Juventus? He hasn’t done well in the league so far. Will it be done again? It is desirable. Will it strengthen in January? I believe little. Will he be able to perform the “miracle” this season too? Miracles are not of this land: Pirlo does not seem to me the type to “open the waters”. Scandal? No: physiology. Sooner or later the teams run out. After nine years of uninterrupted success it was human to happen.
Meanwhile, Ronaldo has won the title of player of the century: a gold chest. For CR7 and for Juventus.
Future compromise? In Turin they think not. There is time to “return”. Bobby Gol Bettega (70 candles for a player who anticipated the future) is convinced of this. Winning the tenth is another film. For now, Juventus is out of the Champions area. At the moment.
–
