Los philosophers, illustrious plague victims, who seek to guide their ideas towards the common good and justice, like the teachers, who have been separated from their students as a consequence of the new educational plans, which some sectarians label as progressive, denounce that from the political power it tries to subtract training and analytical capacity of the population. Most understand that it is easier that way manipulate opinion of those who must vote when their contribution to democracy is claimed, that which some try to call by a different name to justify themselves when they despise it.
The classics, who invented everything that we now develop with new terms, favored thinking to build minds equipped with reason and clarity of ideas. Because ideology is a kind of ethical code where the way to achieve objectives using certain procedures is related. When freedom is subordinated to the claims of a social elite, it will cease to have the significance that is considered assumed by the democratic model that we know and wish to preserve.
In political parties inclined to impose their criteria at all costs, militancy intervention is significantly reduced, although, in reality, in all social organizations, in some way, a minority usually tries to appropriate the leading role to tamper with the opinion of the rest. Even in these pantomime, which appear to be assemblies or non-transparent voting, and there are many examples of this, the most skillful or powerful faction will maneuver to achieve its ends by disguising the result as the result of the will of the majority, which would be the democratic climax.
The opinion of citizens tends to have little effectiveness on the decisions of our social referents, to whom we demand to press the reality of the problems among those who know the matter and seek solutions to achieve higher levels of prosperity and well-being, which should be the most important objective. important, according to those philosophers we forget. Any fool who has the ability to manage public resources and legislate on issues that affect citizens should pass an exam on the ideas developed by Socrates, Seedling y Aristotle.
Unfortunately, they are creating new problems by imposing their sectarian and totalitarian ideas, which provide so little well-being and progress to a society that is perplexed or absorbed in national gossip. When a company seeks to improve its performance, as it should be within a social group, it demands from its members what they now call brainstorming to discuss the possibilities and reach constructive conclusions.
Administrations should enhance their procedures for facilitate the arrival of proposals from citizenswho know about the matter or detect dysfunctions that could improve public services. Now that we are beginning the era of democratic zeal, it would not hurt to demand ideas and encourage direct contact. From that avalanche of ideas there will always be a select percentage of clarity and imagination to apply to the corresponding governance.
The arrogance and petulance of some politicians is usually put to the test when what some citizens offer makes more sense and rationality than the promises in their electoral programs. Times are coming to treat your ears by announcing a veritable string of tales to trick those who are willing to believe them. That’s the main problem, the systematic detachment between potential voters and potential elected officials, which permeates the environment in a cloud of social suspicion, because many are no longer fooled.
Los electoral debates they are nothing more than a shameless exercise in despicable histrionics; the programs have lost their compromise status to become a deceptive advertising campaign typical of scammers. Here goes the first idea of the storm: When urgent and efficient public service is demanded to process mandatory official documents, hours or personnel must be increased.
The Digital Closure is not responsible for the opinions expressed in this section that are made in a private capacity.
