A court in China sentenced the former chairman of the board and party secretary of the country’s largest state-owned bank, Liu Liange, to death with a suspended sentence. He was found guilty of corruption and illegal lending.
Liu led the Bank of China, one of the world’s five largest banks by assets. He was expelled from the Communist Party in 2023, and in February he was detained, removed from office and accused of accepting bribes worth more than 121 million yuan (about $ 16.8 million). He became the most senior person in the country’s financial sector targeted by an anti-corruption campaign. write South China Morning Post Newspaper.
The sentence was suspended for two years, carrying “Xinhua”. Liu was given political rights for life and all his property was confiscated. Under Chinese law, suspended sentences can be up to life in prison.
China seems to be in first place in the world in the number of death sentences given and carried out. The country does not publish such statistics, but human rights activists estimate the number of executions in China at several thousand, Amnesty International said in a report. This is more than in the rest of the world. In 2023, the agency recorded reports of 1,153 executions.
#governor #Bank #China #sentenced #death
2024-11-26 17:36:00
**Considering the suspended death sentence and the potential for commutation, what implications might Liu Liange’s case have for future anti-corruption efforts and judicial practices in China?**
## World Today News Interview: The Case of Liu Liange
**Host:** Welcome to World Today News. Today we are discussing the recent sentencing of Liu Liange, former chairman of the Bank of China, to death with a suspended sentence for corruption and illegal lending. Joining us are Professor Chen Wei, an expert in Chinese law and economics, and Ms. Sarah Jones, a human rights advocate specializing in China. Welcome to both of you.
**Professor Chen Wei & Ms. Sarah Jones:** Thank you for having us.
**Host:** Let’s begin by discussing the specifics of Liu Liange’s case. Professor Chen, could you shed some light on the severity of the charges against him and why this case is seen as particularly significant?
**(Thematic Section: Understanding the Charges and Significance)**
**Professor Chen:**
Liu Liange was accused of accepting bribes exceeding 121 million yuan ($16.8 million) and engaging in illegal lending practices. In the context of China’s anti-corruption campaign, his case is significant because he held a very high-ranking position, leading one of the world’s largest banks. This indicates the government’s commitment to tackling corruption at all levels, regardless of position or influence.
**Host:** Ms. Jones, how does Liu Liange’s case fit into the broader context of China’s human rights record, particularly regarding the death penalty?
**(Thematic Section: Human Rights Considerations and Death Penalty)**
**Ms. Jones:**
The use of the death penalty in China raises serious concerns. While Liu Liange’s sentence was suspended, the fact that it was even considered highlights the potential for this punishment in corruption cases. Amnesty International has consistently criticized China’s high number of executions, which far exceeds the rest of the world combined. It’s vital to emphasize the need for transparency and due process in China’s judicial system, especially concerning capital punishment.
**Host:** Professor Chen, how does Chinese law handle suspended death sentences, and what are the possible implications for Liu Liange?
**(Thematic Section: Suspension of Sentence and Future Implications)**
**Professor Chen:** In China, a suspended death sentence means that the execution is postponed for two years. If Liu Liange adheres to certain conditions during this period, such as good behavior, the sentence could be commuted to life imprisonment. However, if he violates any of these conditions, the original death sentence could be carried out.
**Host:** Ms. Jones, how does the international community react to such practices in China?
**(Thematic Section: International Response and Perspectives)**
**Ms. Jones:**
The international community has expressed significant concern over China’s use of the death penalty, particularly in cases like Liu Liange’s where corruption is the primary offense. There are calls for China to abolish capital punishment and adopt a more transparent and rights-respecting approach to its justice system. This case will likely be subject to scrutiny from human rights organizations and foreign governments.
**Host:** Thank you both for sharing your insights. This is a complex issue with wide-ranging implications. Liu Liange’s case serves as a reminder of the ongoing debate surrounding corruption, accountability, and human rights in China.
**(Closing remarks and call to further explore issues addressed) **
