The concerned agencies presented the four defendants, the friends of the traffic child accused of insulting a police officer, by passing in the Maadi area to the forensic medicine practitioner to conduct a sample analysis of whether or not they use narcotic substances in implementation of the Public Prosecution’s decision.
And one of the forensic doctors in the chemical laboratories of the Forensic Medicine Department took a sample of urine and blood of the four defendants, where the defendants appeared while they were presented to the forensic medicine while shaving Zero.
Counselor Hamada Al-Sawy ordered the Public Prosecutor to place the child violating a traffic police officer in a monitoring house, and to detain those who were in his custody pending investigations.
Within the framework of the Public Prosecution’s completion of the investigations into the incident, it became clear that the transgressive child was published on social media sites as soon as he was handed over to his parents in implementation of the Public Prosecution’s decision, which included his commission of a new crime. The investigations with those who were with him also resulted in circumstances including the continuity of their aggression and the aforementioned child. The police responded as soon as the first incident ended, and they photographed a clip of this transgression that the Public Prosecution circulated today on social media sites, as well as other sections of similar incidents committed by the aforementioned, which was seen by the Public Prosecution that the parents of the accused child did not comply with their commitment to the Public Prosecution As its decision to evaluate his behavior and good care after he was handed over to them, as he immediately broadcasted his departure from the prosecution office yesterday, a new clip that included committing another crime. Then he was deposited in one of the observation houses for a period of one week and held evaluation sessions for his behavior as recommended by the “National Council for Motherhood and Childhood”, provided that it is presented immediately after the expiration of the period to the competent court to look into T extend the deposit.
Within the framework of completing the investigations, the Public Prosecution decided to detain those who were in the company of the accused child in custody for four days pending investigations, and to present them and the child to the “Forensic Medicine Authority” to analyze a sample of them to indicate the extent of their use of any of the narcotic substances, and request a memorandum from the father of the offending child in response to The results of the investigations and the developments in them, and the seizure of the car in which the accused were traveling, inspect it and provide its information with a statement to its actual owner.
On the occasion of the investigation of this incident, the “Public Prosecution” affirms its commitment to enforcing the law and achieving equality among people without discrimination or looking at social considerations or job characteristics. It also confirms that, in the decisions taken yesterday by the accused child, it has implemented what the law obligates it to apply to it. All are equal, and they sought an ideal goal in those decisions; It is the evaluation of this child’s behavior in the prime of his life, but when she saw that his family did not fulfill what they pledged to the “Public Prosecution”, she preferred to place him in one of the observation houses – in implementation of the law – for the same purpose that it sought in its decision yesterday, which is to correct his behavior and deter him from what he committed, which is the maximum What the “Public Prosecution” can take to enforce the law, with its understanding and keenness on the opinion of the public community that it represents, to call for increased procedures and penalties in such incidents, and that this gradualness in the procedures taken by accused children is an approach followed in Egyptian law and in the systems of International laws are bound by the “public prosecution” in this and other incidents on the various social and cultural classes, regardless of the characteristics or persons of their parents or their guardians, as they do not deviate from justice and equality for all.
As one of the highest goals pursued by the “Public Prosecution”, especially in crimes committed by children, other than punishing them and bringing them to trial if they deserve it; Looking into their social and psychological conditions and cooperating with the relevant social institutions to correct their behavior and ward off the evil of crime in their souls, and make them valid elements in their homeland and their people, committed to the values and traditions of this authentic Egyptian society, which the Public Prosecution does not hesitate to preserve with all that the law authorizes Procedures.
