Marlisa Palumbo
From the glamor of marrying Harry, in 2018, to leaving the giant Spotify and the Dukes of Sussex podcast. So the actress allowed the fairy tale to deteriorate. She and now she is also in the crosshairs of feminists, from Camille Paglia to Germaine Greer. Even “his hers” hers America hers seems to have had enough. Now who’s to blame?
At the entrance to St. George’s Church inside Windsor Castle, Carlo, holding Meghan by the arm, turns to her smile, with a kind fatherly look, even if it is “on loan”. He takes hers captures hers lavish flower arrangements from her behind her and a violin escorting the future duchess down the aisle, where Harry, a little clumsy and very affectionate, is waiting for her. The ultra-modern, timeless fairy tale broadcast around the world on May 19, 2018: Another American entering the British royal family with all degrees of honor, after more than eighty years of love for the divorcee Wallis Simpson that pushed Edward VIII to relinquish the crown. Actress, millionaire, feminist and biracial, with a white father and an African-American mother. The halls of St. George mix traditional songs with the sweet melodies of gospel hymns. The world has changed, what could go wrong?
American denials and accusations of racism
Fast forward: May 6, 2023, exactly five years later, Another Live Planet Party. Elizabeth, the seemingly immortal queen, has passed away in September. Prince Charles, who seemed destined never to be king, will be crowned with his bride Camilla at Westminster Abbey. Meghan Markle is not here. Harry is present but on the sidelines and will be in London in less than 24 hours. In California his wife, his son Archie and little Lilibet Diana are waiting for him. The American “Exile” Megist starts on January 8, 2020And when on Instagram, and where? The Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced their decision to step down as senior members of the British royal family, split their time between the UK and North America and become financially independent. In the midst of everything succeeding. Accusations of racism against the royal family In an explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey; The Netflix series has a number of complaints about the Windsorbiografia , shoot and Written by Harry with wizard biographies (like Abre Agassi, to be clear), as fights between brothers are said to lead to physical confrontations.
(deep) disagreements with Diana
Hundreds of front pages, back stories and conclusions. At the start of a new life abroad, the British newspapers were sometimes obscenely harsh and the Americans were sympathetic. The Sussexes chose California not just for Meghan’s homeland: in the country that was separated from the crown at birth and, perhaps for that very reason, fascinated by the monarchy, they thought they could maintain celebrity status without the restrictions of role. And Americans adored Harry’s mother, Lady Diana. The famous feminist writer Camille Paglia, in a 1992 essay that made history, states: Diana the Huntress exposing the cult of the Princess as a reference to a series of archetypes in the collective consciousness, from Cinderella (Madame D. was aristocratic, but as a child she was also a servant, and had a “stepmother”) to Mother Sorrow (the modern Mary who cries but also loves rock and roll). Megan for not being able to move something like that. Critics of her say she lacks originality: originality, the magic word, the holy grail of every American politician (ask Hillary Clinton). Australian feminist Germaine Greer, known for her feminine eunuch, publicly wondering if the actress was faking her love for Harry.
Fate is racially ambiguous
Those who defend them argue instead that deep-rooted prejudices are hidden behind the accusation that they are “liars”. Questions about Markle’s authenticity are steeped in racial and racial politics. wrote about voice Brooke Erin Duffy, from the Department of Gender Studies at Cornell University. As researcher Lisa Nakamura has argued, public figures considered “racially ambiguous” (the biracial Markle) motivate internet operatives to search for the “truth” about their identity. But also black commentators such as Alicia Montgomery slate They define the Duchess’s surprise at discovering the existence of institutionalized racism in the British Royal House as disturbing and disturbing (from the series: Where are the news?). A bit like an actress she brought to a grown woman living in the modern world, she claimed that she did not fully know Harry when she first met him.. It is true that fairy tales prescribe suspension of disbelief, but in a nutshell. Somewhere between the fifth and sixth hours of the series. harry and megan which suggests that there is no one in love, more attentive to social issues, sadder, My natural sympathy is for the couple, wrote Joanna Weiss. In a controversial article on Political
He started to get irritated and realized that his ego had its limits.
Narcissism like Musk and Trump
Weiss places Megan among a group of extreme narcissists, from Elon Musk to Donald Trump, who… used attention as a bargaining chip and ego as fuel. and that by now they would have exhausted public opinion. Also in a 1992 article, Paglia wrote that Diana could project her personality without using words. Her medium is photography and cinematography: she can, rightly, be the top star of silent movies. Later, the princess also spoke, of course, to tell her the whole truth in front of the BBC cameras, but perhaps Meghan and Harry went too far in this kind of psychoanalytic session in front of the world. Even the constant reference to her, Lady D, while evoking feelings of sympathy for Harry, the orphan boy who until adulthood thought his mother wasn’t really dead, but went into hiding and could hold him again, seems a bit over the top at times. As in the episode two months ago in New York, when the police denied that the speaker, who spoke of a near-disastrous car chase by paparazzi, wanted to evoke the Alma Tunnel accident in the collective imagination.
The prince and his wife are naked.
Diana used the media that were her allies until they devoured her. It seems that the press is tired of Meghan even in America. Polls show the Dukes’ popularity is in free fall: What are the Sussexes going to do now that Spotify has canceled their multimillion-dollar contract because the royals fell short of productivity and a streaming company executive called them fucking con artists? Now that there is no idea how they honor their $100 million deal with Netflix and which many brands don’t want to be associated with? What will they do, but above all: who will they blame? Before they could point fingers at the villains of the royal family, but now? Now, according to their detractors, they are exposed to a lack of real talent. Maureen Dowd wrote in her article: The New York Times. Watching as the dukes at the time of their “separation” from London ordered hundreds of items, from socks to hooded shirts, to be trademarked with the royal crest of Sussex, Dowd’s brilliant pen slammed the punch: (All this) Wallis Simpson makes exile in the Bahamas, dedicated to matching the color of the walls with his face powder, seem like a monastic experience.
Study the Obama family
Early in their marriage, when Meghan traveled with Harry to Africa and danced with girls she could relate to, or when she cooked with women from the multi-racial association that helped victims of the Grenfell Tower fire, it seemed that the two could really give the monarchy a new look of modernity. Rather than give up royal influence to become an Instagram influencer, Dodd writes, the Duchess could have been inspired by the Obama family, who overcame racist attacks and worked to change things from within institutions. Inside, Meghan represented the day with gospel songs at St George’s.
Jul 22, 2023 (modified Jul 22, 2023 | 16:21)
© Reproduction Reserved
2023-07-22 16:25:57
#years #squandered #Corriere.it
