Misdeeds also have a ‘pull effect’ on society, especially when they are disguised as a just cause, a social claim. In Seville, a woman has ‘kidnapped’ her two children so as not to have to share custody with the father and the first coincidence that we find, which allows us to call her the ‘Juana Rivas denier’ is that perversion that leads some to justify, even to protect and defend, the commission of a crime. With the striking difference that it is the extremes of politics, the most radicalized sectors of society, that encourage these criminal behaviors. Extremes meet …
But let’s go to the origin of the story, the moment in which a mother decides to ‘kidnap’ her children, that statement that we have become used to reading, ignoring the terrible paradox that it contains, that a mother ‘kidnaps’ her children, hide them from their biological father, with the only wish to hurt your ex-partner. We have been aware of this last case since last November, exactly on November 4, which was the first day that Cristina Mariscal, the copy of Juana Rivas, stopped taking her two children to school, Diego and Hugo, 14 and 12 years old. . Upon hearing of what happened, the father of the children, David Kau, an American who has lived in Spain for years, decides to file the corresponding legal complaint and, after a few weeks, the judge fails in his favor. It is then, in the middle of December, when the woman decides to take her two children and hide in some place that, to this day, the Civil Guard has not managed to locate although she has already combed several areas of the province of Seville and Cádiz where it was supposed to hide.
In this recent case of Cristina Mariscal, the ‘justification’ is that her ex-husband intends to vaccinate children against covid
As said at the beginning, which allows us to compare two cases that, strictly speaking, have nothing to do with each other, is the method used by this woman from Seville for something that, unfortunately, is too common in ex-partner relationships with the minor children that both have in common: the use of children to hurt the other. Juana Rivas used as an argument to justify her crime is that her ex-husband had been convicted years ago for a crime of mistreatment, in its mildest criminal definition, while in this recent case of Cristina Mariscal the ‘justification’ is that her ex-husband, The one who has been divorced for six years, intends to vaccinate children against covid, to which she opposes.
As is known, Juana Rivas found support and encouragement from the most radical sector feminism, which led her to exponentially aggravate the crime she was committing until I end up in jail. The extreme radicality is, in the same way, what characterizes the anti-vaccines, as before the ‘deniers’ of the covid-19, and that sector seems to be entrusted to the ‘Juana Rivas’ of Seville, although at the moment it has not found an echo among those who defend those positions, especially on the extreme right. But the mindset is the same.
EP
–
It also happens that just as Juana Rivas found the legal support of those who gave her legal advice, Cristina Mariscal has also found the collaboration of a lawyer who, through the interviews she has been granted in different media, has been fully impregnated with the cause. The absurdity is of such magnitude that this woman’s lawyer, Borja Gómez, even affirms in the interviews that your client is not committing a crime because there is “good cause” to take the children, how is it your opposition to the vaccine. As happened with Juana Rivas, what this type of defense achieves, in the end, is that the penalties are aggravated far above the seriousness of the act committed, because each day that passes criminal aggravations are added due to contempt and judicial disobedience.
In fact, the complaint filed by the children’s father when the woman stopped taking them to school was already resolved by a court on December 16, agreeing with the ex-husband, whom granted him custody and urged the mother to comply with the law. The woman’s response was to disappear with her two children, with which she accumulates violations and crimes, from the right of minors to school – she should know better than anyone, because she is a teacher – to that of vaccination, passing through the judicial contempt and kidnapping. But the new ‘Juana Rivas’ maintains, as we know from her lawyer, that she only wants to “protect them, above all, from the vaccine” against the pandemic and from her father, who is in favor of vaccinating them, without his judgment, note “endless effects serious side effects that the vaccine has ”.
Silvia Alvarez. Athens A. Alamillos Map: Marta Ley
–
Without even needing to enter the reckless inconsistency of those who keep repeating that covid vaccines are “an experiment” and that they cause damage to people’s health, despite scientific and statistical evidence which has already proven otherwiseWith tens of thousands of lives saved, what is indisputable in a state of law like ours is that no father, no mother, can decide about their children freely, over and above the rights that minors have.
In this case of vaccination, there have been several conflicts that have arisen in various Spanish provinces and, in all cases, the Justice has ruled in favor of the vaccination of minors, “the best interests of the child”, as all the sentences collect. The reluctance of the father or the mother has no value whatsoever before the criterion, “the notorious fact”, that the vaccine is endorsed by international and Spanish health security organizations, such as the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products, and the scientific experience accumulated after the hundreds of millions of vaccines administered around the world. But none of all this makes a dent in this new ‘Juana Rivas’ who now demands that the vaccination campaign be stopped if they want her to return her children. The terrible thing is that there is no one by his side who whispers to him that, if he continues like this, he will end up in jail. And that, of course, your children will receive the vaccine.
–