The court did not grant bail to Attorney Anon –penguin– Somchai – Mo Lam Bank From the criminal case under Section 112 and other charges The royal court officials took the four to detention at a special prison in Bangkok.
Today (February 9) the court examines the weight of the charges. And the circumstances of the case Saw that the case had a high penalty rate The circumstances of the case are serious. The defendant’s actions are repetitive. Different karma, different agenda according to the same charge many times If there is a reason to believe that If temporary release is permitted, the defendants will continue to cause the same incident again. In this class, the temporary release of the petition was not permitted.
After this, the correctional officer will take all four of them to the Bangkok Special Prison.
Earlier, during the past today, Mr. Prayut Petchkhun, Deputy Spokesman for the Office of the Attorney General Mentioned the order of Mr. Prit Chivarak orpenguin, Mr. Anon Nampha, Mr. Patiwat Sarai Yam or Mo Lam Bank and Mr. Somyot Prueksakasemsuk, accused 1-4, the leader and the coalition of people, said the case has two expressions. The only case was Mr. Prit on the charge of defaming the King. Criminal Code, Section 112, Inciting instigators under Section 116 of Criminal Code and violating demonstrations Emergency decree Which the Prosecutor of the Criminal Division 7 With an order to sue all 3 counts
Another idiom (19-20 September 2020 at Thammasat University, Tha Prachan-Sanam Luang) accuses the four accused of the charges under Section 112, Section 116, joining 10 or more people according to Por. Criminal Section 215, violating the Public Assembly Act, violating the Emergency Decree, obstructing the public way, jointly obstructing traffic, setting up objects on the road in violation of the law, destroying historic sites, Spoil the property And sharing the advertisement through the amplifier without the permission of the Total 11 counts In which the prosecutor of the Criminal Division 7 ordered to sue all four of the accused.
However, when asked about the case in which the accused submits a letter requesting fairness Mr. Prayut said The prosecutor considered and ordered that Witness to give further examinations There are no changes to comments and orders. Because there is sufficient evidence in the sentence already Do not proceed in accordance with the request for fairness After this, the prosecutor will bring the four accused to the criminal court.
However, after givingnewsOf Mr. Prayut The Deputy Spokesman for the Attorney General’s Office was Mr. Prit or Penguin, who also walked in to hear the announcement. Asked back Mr. Prayut Emphasizing the issue of the Fairness Request letter that the principles of rights and freedoms are protected by international standards. In which Mr. Prayut clarified that As for the spokesperson’s work, the results of the prosecution’s order were brought to the media. As for the expression, the spokesperson’s job could not be explained. Because not responsible for the idioms And I’m not sure if it’s a court fight or not
Prit or Penguin said the case was a case that affected people’s freedom of expression nationwide standard. Must clarify the operating norms of the prosecutor’s organization. This case is a political case. How can the justice system protect the rights and liberties of the people?
While Mr. Prayut replied that in accordance with the Criminal Code, there was a principle that presumed the person sued by the prosecutor was innocent. As long as there is no final judgment of guilty And the prosecutor will sue if enough evidence is sued The issues discussed can be fought in court.
After that, Mr. Prit spoke of the witnesses who had given additional examinations to speak about the rights of civil liberties. He said that the prosecutor’s organization did not recognize the importance of freedom of expression.
For this case, the 7 criminal prosecutors brought Mr. Prit or Penguin and four of them to file a lawsuit against the court. By filing a total of 2 cases, namely, Black Case No. 286/2564 filed against Mr. Prit Is the only defendant In the event that between 13-15 June 2020, Mr. Prit, who is the leader, organizes a public gathering at Khok Wua Intersection Stage. By inciting some 5,000 participants into the rallies rebellious Call for institutional reform Insulting the King, Queen and Heir-apparent under Criminal Justice Section 112.
The other case is the Black Case No. 287/2546, the criminal prosecutor 7 filed a lawsuit against Mr. Prit with four of them as the defendant in the case between 19-20 September 2020. Organize a gathering in Thammasat University, Tha Prachan and Sanam Luang. Around 20,000 people attended the demonstration, demanding that Prime Minister Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha resign. Request that the constitution be amended And institutional reform
Later, the court examined the testimony of the defendants. The defendants declare their refusal to defend the case, the court therefore arranged to examine the evidence of both parties by the black case Tor 286/2564, appointment date 15 March time 09.00 and black case Tor 287/2564 date 15. Jan. time 1:30 p.m.
While the lawyer filed a petition with the securities in cash Request for temporary release of all 4 leaders, but the court dismissed the petition as presented above.
– .
