The Central Administrative Court Brakes High-Speed Train Construction Project Kaeng Khoi – Klang Dong And during the Pang Asoke – temporary horse ladder after the order of the Civil Service Commission considering the appeal of the Comptroller of the Comptroller General’s Department for the BPNP to win the auction, it may be unlawful.
On February 25 at the Administrative Court, Changwattana Road. The Central Administrative Court ordered to abate the enforcement of the procurement process for the 3-1 Thai-Chinese railway construction project for the Kaeng Khoi-Klang Dong section. And during Pang Asoke – Horse Stairs Cooperation Project between the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand and the Government of the People’s Republic of China In developing a high-speed rail system to connect regions Bangkok – Nong Khai (Phase 1 Bangkok – Nakhon Ratchasima) temporarily until the court gives a judgment or order otherwise.
According to China Railway Number Ten Engineering Group Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against the State Railway of Thailand (SRT), the Commission on Procurement and Procurement Management, the Comptroller General’s Department. And the Appeal and Complaints Committee, the Comptroller General’s Department, jointly changed the procurement results of the 3-1 Thai-Chinese railway construction project by allowing BPNP Co., Ltd. to win the illegal auction. To the Central Administrative Court By requesting the court to issue an order to stay the execution of the order of the Appeal and Complaint Committee, the Comptroller General’s Department
The court considered that Although hearing that BPNP Company Limited is a joint venture that has registered a new juristic person But in bidding according to the announcement and the electronic tender document requires others to submit on behalf “Joint Venture”, which BPNP Co., Ltd. filled in the bidding system is the bidder in the name of “Company”, does not fill in the name of “Joint Venture”, therefore does not comply with the announcement and electronic tender documents.
Therefore, BPNP Co., Ltd. cannot use the construction work of any shareholder in a limited company. To present as their own work BPNP Co., Ltd. has made a proposal by using the construction work of B-Nam Puri SDNBSD Co., Ltd., which the certificate from the project owner is PRASARANA. MALAYSIA BERHD certifies that B-Nam Puri SDNBSD Company Limited is a subcontractor of the joint venture BPHB – TIM SEKATA JV. Main contractor. Without specifying the value of the work But there is only evidence of contract of employment between the main contractor and subcontractor, so it does not comply with the announcement and electronic tender documents.
When the Appeal and Complaints Committee, the Comptroller General’s Department, ruled that the appeal of BPNP Co., Ltd. had heard about the legality of the appeal. The Comptroller General’s department in this class is likely not lawful.
In addition, the said project is the bidding process for the construction of the project only part of the route. SRT continues to announce And an electronic price preliminary document for developing a high-speed rail system to connect regions Bangkok – Nong Khai During other contract work to invite interested parties to bid
In this case, it was seen that Also does not affect the operation of SRT in other areas and does not hinder the management of SRT since it has not yet been available to the public to use the transport of goods on such rail lines that may affect the public service of the SRT. Thor. Therefore, it is seen that this stay of execution Not a hindrance to the administration of the state And does not affect the public service of SRT.
–
