Tribune. All the perpetrators of pedophile sexual violence know the law, they know that what they do is “outside the law” of humans. Otherwise, why would they impose silence on their young victims? If they know this, all the more so when their functions lead them to master the rules of law as professionals, how can we explain that this rule of humanity is being transgressed?
For a long time only the criminal act to be penalized was considered. As for the subject who exercised it, he was qualified as “pervert”. He was thus brought back to a hated category, one that psychiatry has long considered “uneducable and unamendable”.
Today, numerous studies show that this word, which has become a quasi-insult, is a poor hide-and-seek. Indeed, if a subject knows that he transgresses and does it anyway, and therefore implicitly that he imposes suffering on a third party and that he himself puts himself in penal danger, it is because inside something is constrained by his psychic organization. That he cannot really oppose it and that he will then have to build a system to hide its effects. In short, that everything be done so that this part of him does not exist.
This is done at the cost of a murder of childhood or adolescence, that which supports the victim. But, that the suffering of the victims, however intense and dilapidating it is and which requires revelation, recognition, judgment and reparation, does not come to obscure what research for nearly thirty years shows us concerning the psychological functioning of these perpetrators of violence. pedophiles.
Self-preservation strategy
If they act in the shadows, it is because, in a certain way, they are unable to restrain themselves, to do otherwise. After all, they might just masturbate if it was just a sexual urge to discharge. But things are much more complex. Their act, whatever the violence, saves them from a danger they don’t know they feel but which moves them. When the act begins, the subject finds himself in a form of self-preservation strategy that makes him erase any real perception of the suffering inflicted on others and of the criminal risks incurred. It’s him or the victim. It will be him.
The inaudible in this situation, but which, nevertheless, it is necessary to describe well, is that the goal sought by these authors is not so much the pleasure as to be able to give way unknown discomfort that runs through them at that time. “Let this stop! “
You have 61.58% of this article to read. The rest is for subscribers only.
–
