Home » News » The Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) confirms that it isn’t topic to the Legal professional Normal, it won’t request a letter of authorization relating to the interim choice of Gazalba Saleh

The Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) confirms that it isn’t topic to the Legal professional Normal, it won’t request a letter of authorization relating to the interim choice of Gazalba Saleh

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta – Vice-Chairman of the Corruption Eradication Fee no KPK Nurul Ghufron mentioned that his occasion wouldn’t request a letter of illustration from the Legal professional Normal’s Workplace in response to the Corruption Court docket permitting aside from the inactive Excessive Court docket Choose Gazalba Saleh.

“We won’t request a letter of illustration from the Legal professional Normal’s Workplace. “The KPK is an unbiased regulation enforcement company, not underneath the Legal professional Normal’s Workplace,” Ghufron mentioned. TempoWednesday, 29 Might 2024.

He mentioned that the Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) would take authorized motion towards difficult or interesting the interim choice.

“Delegation is to provide authority from senior officers to subordinates by giving accountability. If that is completed it means breaking Article 3 of Legislation 19:2019,” mentioned Ghufron.

Beforehand, the Panel of Judges on the Corruption Crime Court docket (Tipikor) on the Central Jakarta District Court docket (PN) in an interim choice granted an exception to the chief decide. Gaza Saleh. The decide assessed that the Director of Prosecution of the Corruption Eradication Committee didn’t obtain a delegation of prosecution authority from the Legal professional Normal to prosecute Gazalba Saleh.

Promoting




Promoting

“Please fill out the paperwork, administration, will. “Whether it is submitted once more, it may be submitted, that is only a formality,” Chief Choose Fahzal Hendri mentioned when he learn the interim choice on the Jakarta Central District Court docket , Monday, 27 Might 2024.

Member Justice Rianto mentioned that though the Fee for the Elimination of Corruption has prosecution duties and capabilities domestically, the Director of Prosecutions of the Committee for the Elimination of Corruption has by no means acquired a delegation of prosecution authority from the Legal professional Normal as the highest public prosecutor in response to the rules. Single prosecution system.

“Which means that there isn’t a delegation of authority as a public prosecutor and that there isn’t a data (rationalization) relating to the implementation of authority and directions (directions) relating to the usage of authority. “Until the above circumstances of delegation are met,” he mentioned.

Primarily based on the issues of the Panel of Judges, all prosecutors of the Fee for the Elimination of Corruption who act as public prosecutors in prosecuting all instances of Corruption and TPPU are primarily based on an order from a Director Prosecution of the Corruption Eradication Fee, whereas that individual isn’t doing. is the authority.

“Letter of order Legal professional Normal “We should first subject an appointment for a public prosecutor to resolve the case from the Director of Prosecution of the Corruption Eradication Fee primarily based on Article 18 Paragraph 1 of Legislation No. 11 of 2021,” he mentioned.

Learn Tempo Particular Articles: KPK vs Gazalba Saleh Guide 4

2024-05-30 02:58:34


#Corruption #Eradication #Committee #KPK #confirms #topic #Legal professional #Normal #request #letter #authorization #interim #choice #Gazalba #Saleh

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.