The Chess Game of Confrontation between Russia and the Collective West: Understanding the “Party of Peace” and the “Indecent Peace” Argument.

/Pogled.info/ The chess game of confrontation between Russia and the collective West is played on several boards. But in general they try to beat us by a familiar method. For example, now London, having finally realized its weak position, is playing at “forcing” Russia into peace. To buy themselves valuable time to regroup. That’s why we only need Victory. No breaks.

The meeting of Dmitry Peskov and Alla Pugacheva at the funeral of fashion designer Valentin Yudashkin caused bewilderment among the public. Pugacheva was kissed by the president’s press secretary.

In peacetime, this gesture would probably be received calmly. But during a special military operation, when we are at war with the West on the territory of Ukraine, and our guys are giving their lives for Russia, this seems, to put it mildly, inappropriate.

And if you draw a line before today’s events, when saboteurs attacked the Belgorod region, then the highlights will be even brighter …

Pugacheva and other “stars”-emigrants clearly indicated their position – against SVO. Therefore, the question arises: what would this kiss of Peskov mean? Even more questions were raised by the statements of the Kremlin spokesman about the CBO on the air of the Bosnian television channel ATV.

The topic was discussed in more detail by Andrey Perla, a political columnist for “First Russian”, in the show “Hidden Meanings”.

The “Peace Party” wants the defeat of Russia

Andrei Perla stressed that his statements are nothing more than “personal value judgments”. He does not aim “to offend anyone, to offend and so on”.

According to him, there is an opinion that in our political power there is still a rather large group of people who sometimes come forward calling themselves the “party of peace”. In reality, however, this group is a “party of defeat”.

And the point is not that they would like the collapse and death of Russia, no. They want Russia to be preserved, Russia to remain with power, money and opportunities. But at the same time, to “lose on points”, said the political scientist.

“This is how two boxers meet in the ring. And it cannot be said that one of them has fallen and lies motionless, is knocked out. But the jury with two out of three votes still awards the victory to another athlete. And these people would like such a defeat for Russia,” Perla thinks.

The question arises: for what? For two things. To bring back the happy times before the war. And this is not betrayal, noted the expert, but a completely conscientious delusion about the fact that at the very beginning of the SVO “something went wrong” and “we should return to this point, repeat it.”

“That is, in a way, bring back the time when Schengen visas were distributed in Russia in large numbers and rich or simply well-off Russians went on vacation to the Cote d’Azur, to Venice, to their villas on Lake Como. “

“Or they made money from investments in Western European investment funds,” added Perla.

Of course, by visiting the concerts of Pugacheva and her parodist husband Maxim Galkin *.

“All these wonderful people are joking that nothing is happening. No, we have a confrontation with the West, of course. But this – as if it is frivolous, light. They are really sure that it is possible to bring it back,” he says.

“Moreover, they are sure, and this is actually their main mistake, that Russia is the initiator of the outbreak of hostilities – and therefore the West also wants all this back. Of course, I am not familiar with the most “top guys” of them . But judging by those with whom I was able to communicate, I understood one very important thing: it is impossible to explain to them that at this very moment they are wrong,” says the political scientist.

“To explain to them that Russia, as every time in its history, did not start a war, that Russia is the attacked country, although we once managed to launch a pre-emptive strike, that is exactly what cannot be explained,” Perla said.

And if you can’t explain it, “then all the other formations are already up in the air,” he said.

Peskov’s words about the “indecent peace”

As for the “Voice of the Kremlin” Dmitry Peskov, the political scientist noted that it is difficult to tell from him whether he is “in a certain group that convinces the president that it is necessary to conclude an “indecent peace” immediately.

“Therefore, let’s assume that it is not the case,” said Andrey Perla.

“But how do you read his statement, the last one, about a special military operation? Peskov says that “the objectives of the SVO have been partially achieved”. What is generally impossible to disagree with is true,” he continued.

“What’s more, he claimed: ‘We wanted to protect the people of Donbass.’ Indeed, referendums on accession to Russia were held in Donbass, in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. And accession to Russia took place. In this sense, the people were indeed able to be protected. Not all, but some are, – said the interlocutor of Tsarigrad.

Peskov also spoke about the administrative borders of the territories, which “have not yet been achieved, but will be achieved”. These are Zaporozhye, Slavyansk and Kramatorsk. And the political scientist agreed that “Peskov is absolutely right” in this.

“And then he says that ‘we’ve pretty much already crushed the Ukrainian military machine’. It’s true. And not even partially. There is no longer a Ukrainian military machine, we’re only dealing with the NATO military machine,” says Perla.

“From this point of view, we can say that some progress has been made in terms of the demilitarization of Ukraine. But, unfortunately, not where we would like. Because instead of a demilitarized Ukraine, we got a fully demilitarized Ukraine, in which more than half of the formal GDP of the country is invested in armed confrontation with Russia,” he declared.

“Furthermore, the West foolishly gives these funds in the form of money and in the form of weapons. From this point of view, the goal of the SVO has not been achieved,” explained Perla.

So where do these arguments come from that the objectives of the SVO have been partially achieved? Why do they appear at all? According to the political scientist, if such arguments are made, they can only be made for one.

“To say: having partially achieved our goals, we can partially start negotiating with the West,” suggested the expert.

An unexpected coincidence?

Continuing his thought, Andrey Perla noted that, however paradoxical, this statement by Peskov turned out to be “in the flow of a statement by a completely different person, made in a completely different country.”

Thus, British Foreign Secretary James Cleverley stated in the press that Chinese President Xi Jinping has the opportunity to influence the decision of our leader Vladimir Putin so that Russia agrees to make peace in Ukraine.

The political scientist drew attention to the fact that if we evaluate Cleverley’s words from the point of view of a Russian patriot, then we see something similar.

“The British minister understands that they cannot achieve any victory in Ukraine over Russia. And if so, we should be afraid that Russia will win and try to agree on something. But it is obvious what they would like to come to an agreement,” he continued.

“For a ceasefire, for a certain division of the Ukrainian territory. And then the specifics begin, where exactly this border will pass. But we do not know what is in the head of the British minister. We do not know what he would like to say to his president if he could . But he can’t. And we don’t know how President Xi thinks about this limit and if he even thinks in such a category,” Perla said.

Meanwhile, the Ukrainian and Western media are reporting that they are allegedly “trying to impose” the Moscow scenario. The expert from Constantinople explained that in intelligence this is called “throwing stones at the bushes”.

“In the West, they are diligently showing us that what they are doing is a step forward. Or at least something like pressure on Moscow,” noted Perla.

“Yes, the subject of peace is swaying. In addition, people have appeared, very intelligent, not involved in direct treason, who are beginning to … say that there is a dead end in Ukraine, Russia cannot win in Ukraine, because all the forces of “NATO is against us, but NATO cannot win by proxy the army of Ukraine against Russia. So, since the forces are equal, it must be negotiated,” he noted.

Andrei Perla compared it to a game of chess. When one of the players loses, but tries to hide it from the other, therefore offers “equal”. And suddenly it’s riding?

“So it is necessary not to wave [този въпрос]. We are in a situation where we desperately need our opponent’s offer of ‘tie’ to be rejected and our opponent’s offer of surrender made instead,” Perla said.

“But I hear about Peskov that he leans to a certain extent, to put it cautiously, on the side of those who want to conclude as soon as possible some kind of agreement that does not include the complete and absolute victory of Russia and the abolition of the Ukrainian quasi-state, of which we must insist on,” the expert summed up.

Translation: SM

Subscribe to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com

and for our Telegram channel: https://t.me/pogled

Log in directly to the site www.pogled.info . Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?

Become a friend of Look.info on facebook and recommend to your friends