Jakarta, CNN Indonesia —
Commission III DPR deny the election of leadership candidates and members of the board of directors (Dewas) KPK 2024-2029 is just lip service as it is set.
DPR Commission III Chairman Habiburokhman said that the public would see the appropriate and correct testing process (appropriate and correct test) held democratically.
“I think otherwise. The public will see for themselves that the process of electing mayors and mayors is very democratic,” said Habib on the phone, Thursday (21/11).
SEVENTEEN
CHECK TO CONTINUE WITH INDEX
Politician Gerindra said that all members of Commission III of the DPR were given the freedom to exercise their right to speak and vote. The proof, he said, was that several members asked them pointed questions.
Then, the election was also made late to vote with very different polls. According to Habib, if there is a situation, voices tend to be the same for some people.
“The votes received by the candidates were also different. Logically, if there was a situation, the votes received by the five people who were elected would not be the same,” he said.
Habib said that the DPR opened from the beginning a place where the public could give their opinions. However, representatives of the community coalition did not comment.
In fact, he said, it is a process adequate and proper test until the election was kept open from morning to night.
“This is the community that criticizes, PBHI, why does no one give letters? There are none. People do not come to us. Although the process is open from morning to night. I read questions from students asking to ask for help. And they weren’t there,” he said.
The Coalition of Civil Society which consisted of the Indonesian Legal Aid Association (PBHI) and Transparency International Indonesia (TII) accused the leadership of KPK for the period 2024-2029 of being appointed. According to them, appropriate and proper selection and testing is just lip service.
According to the coalition, in the midst of an integrity crisis, the DPR RI Commission III should select candidates for the leadership and board of directors of KPK with a good track record. However, what happened was just the opposite.
“Nolan election, the position of KPK leadership candidates who can risk corruption,” Julius Hebrew of PBHI said in a press release on Thursday.
The five names of the main leaders and supervisors of KPK for the period 2024-2029 were confirmed at the plenary meeting of the DPR III Commission. These names are then taken to the nearest plenary session and sent to the president.
(thr/tsa)
2024-11-21 17:30:00
#Chairman #Commission #III #DPR #denies #election #KPK #leaders #rigged
Considering the conflicting viewpoints presented regarding public participation, what concrete mechanisms could be implemented to ensure meaningful citizen involvement and oversight in future KPK leadership selections?
## The Selection of KPK Leadership: A Conversation
**Introduction**
Welcome to World Today News for a closer look at the recent election of the KPK leadership. Joining us today are Habiburokhman, Chairman of Commission III of the Indonesian DPR, and Juliusй Hebrew, representative of the Indonesian Legal Aid Association (PBHI).
**Section 1: Claims of a “Rigged” Election**
* **Host:** Mr. Hebrew, your coalition claims the election of the KPK leadership was rigged. What evidence supports this claim, and how does it contradict the DPR’s assertion of a fair and democratic process?
* **Mr. Hebrew:** We argue that the process fell short of a genuine selection. Despite the rhetoric of “appropriate and proper testing,” the chosen candidates lacked the proven track record of integrity essential for leading an anti-corruption body during a time of crisis.
* **Host:** Mr. Habiburokhman, how do you respond to these allegations? The public has expressed concerns about transparency and potential bias in the selection process.
* **Mr. Habiburokhman:** We understand the concerns, but the process was entirely open. Members of Commission III were free to question candidates rigorously, and the voting process itself was diverse, reflecting a range of opinions.
**Section 2: The Importance of “Appropriate and Proper Testing”**
* **Host:** The concept of “appropriate and proper testing” is central to this debate. Can you both explain your interpretations of this phrase, and how it should be implemented in selecting KPK leaders?
* **Mr. Hebrew:** “Appropriate and proper testing” should involve a thorough assessment of each candidate’s record, including their commitment to anti-corruption efforts and their ability to withstand political pressure. We believe this process was lacking.
* **Mr. Habiburokhman:** We believe the testing process was rigorous. Candidates were subjected to public hearings, where their expertise and qualifications were thoroughly examined by Commission III members.
**Section 3: The Role of Public Participation**
* **Host:** Mr. Habiburokhman mentioned the opportunity for public participation. How can the DPR ensure meaningful public input in future KPK leadership selections?
* **Mr. Habiburokhman:** We encourage the public to actively engage in the process. We welcome feedback, suggestions, and questions to ensure that the selection process remains transparent and accountable.
* **Mr. Hebrew:** While opportunities existed, they felt insufficient. We need more robust mechanisms for public scrutiny and commentary, perhaps even public hearings where citizens can directly raise their concerns.
**Section 4: Looking Ahead**
* **Host:** Moving forward, what steps can be taken to rebuild public trust in the KPK and ensure its continued effectiveness?
* **Mr. Hebrew:** We need to focus on selecting leaders with demonstrably strong anti-corruption credentials and a commitment to transparency. We also need to empower the KPK with the resources and independence it needs to function effectively.
* **Mr. Habiburokhman:** The DPR remains committed to supporting the KPK in its vital role. We are confident that the newly appointed leadership will uphold the highest standards of integrity and professionalism.
**Conclusion**
The selection of KPK leadership is a crucial matter for Indonesia’s fight against corruption. This conversation has highlighted the need for ongoing dialog and collaboration between the DPR, civil society organizations, and the public to ensure a transparent and accountable process that protects the integrity of this important institution.
**Thank you to both our guests for sharing their insights. We encourage our viewers to engage in this critical discussion and continue to demand accountability from their leaders.**
