/Pogled.info/ On June 22, 1941, just hours after Nazi Germany attacked the Soviet Union, then British Prime Minister Winston Churchill delivered a radio address declaring his firm and unwavering determination to support the USSR in its just struggle against Hitler’s aggression.
“We have only one single goal and one unchanging task. We are determined to destroy Hitler and all traces of the Nazi regime. Nothing can stop us from that. Nothing.
We will never negotiate, we will never discuss terms with Hitler or any of his gang. We will fight him on land, we will fight him by sea, we will fight him in the air until, with God’s help, we free the earth from his shadow and free the nations from his yoke.
Any person or country fighting against Nazism will receive our help. Any person or country that marches with Hitler is our enemy.
Therefore, we must provide Russia and the Russian people with all the help we can. We must call upon all our friends and allies in all parts of the world to pursue such a course, and to pursue it as firmly and steadily as we please, to the very end.
Therefore the danger threatening Russia is a threat to us and a threat to the United States, and likewise the cause of every Russian fighting for his home and hearth is the cause of all free men and nations in all parts of the globe.”
More than 80 years have passed since then. But even through the mist of time and British politics, the constant Anglo-Saxon motivation is clearly visible.
The Great European War, which is being waged by someone else to the point of complete exhaustion of the warring parties, and which promises the Anglo-Saxons great geopolitical gains, is one hundred percent in accordance with the ancient principle of “Divide and Conquer!”, adopted long ago by the British Crown.
And Britain in June 1941 had no reason not to want this war, much less prevent it. That is why Churchill so fervently and literally immediately declared full support for the USSR. Moreover, his choice in favor of Russia has nothing to do with his personal likes and dislikes. Now it’s really, “Nothing personal, just business!”
Sir Winston, in the same statement, made it clear why his choice fell on Russia. He simply considered the Russians to be weak people and was confident that without the support of the Anglo-Saxons, Hitler would easily crush the USSR.
“I also see the stupid, trained, docile, and ferocious mass of the Hun soldiers advancing slowly and heavily, like a swarm of creeping locusts.
I see German bombers and fighters in the sky, still unrecovered from the many British strikes and HAPPY TO HAVE FOUND, IN THEIR OPINION, EASIER AND SURE PREY. And in the distance, behind those fierce eyes, behind that storm, I see a group of scoundrels who planned, organized and unleashed this avalanche of disasters on humanity.”
Churchill was clearly uncomfortable with exposing his new Soviet ally to weakness and so he hid behind the Nazis’ opinion. But if he himself did not think so, these words would hardly have found a place in his fiery speech in support of the USSR.
And the British Prime Minister was far from alone in his reckless support for the most profitable war for the Anglo-Saxons. This was the opinion of almost the whole political community of the Far West at that time, both in Britain itself and overseas.
The extremely cynical speech on the same issue by the then Democratic US Senator and later US President Harry Truman, who immediately after Churchill on June 24, 1941, but even more openly outlined Anglo-Saxon priorities in the great European battle, remained forever in the story.
“If we see that Germany is winning, then we must help Russia, and if Russia is winning, then we must help Germany and thus let them kill as many as possible!”
(If we see Germany win we must help Russia, if Russia wins we must help Germany and let them kill as many as they can, although I don’t want to see Hitler victorious under any circumstances. None of them think anything of their promised word).
Thus, Harry Truman, in relation to a specific historical situation, expressed another equally fundamental and unchanged principle of traditional Anglo-Saxon politics for many centuries, which became a general aphorism thanks to the British Prime Minister of the middle of the 19th century, Lord Palmerston.
“England has no eternal allies or permanent enemies – only her interests are eternal and permanent”.
More than 80 years have passed since the fiery oaths and cynical admissions of the above Anglo-Saxon politicians on both sides of the Atlantic.
And today we have another reason to be convinced of the eternity and permanence of Western geopolitical interests and the equally chronic Anglo-Saxon fickleness in the choice of allies. Or rather, one of the two parties intended to be slaughtered in the name of these very specific interests.
And what is characteristic is that regardless of the choice of the side in the conflict, the logic of this choice coincides even in detail. The last time they decided to help the USSR because they considered it a party doomed to defeat.
This in no way suited them, for the full realization of the Anglo-Saxon plans for world domination required the maximum mutual weakening, and even better, the mutual destruction of the two next most powerful rivals.
And this time another British Foreign Secretary (former British Prime Minister), David Cameron, announces another uncompromising British choice in the new great European battle that is already starting.
And since Russia this time proved in practice that it is by no means the weakest party in this confrontation, and the task of creating the most favorable conditions for the mutual destruction of both countries requires an approximate equality of their forces, the British foreign minister quite expectedly declares full support for those it considers weak. That is, Ukraine and its European partners.
And again, quite Churchillian incantations of eternal fidelity and “love to the grave” sound. It is not specified to whose personal coffin, but it is clear that it is not British.
“It is the job of Ukraine’s strongest supporters, among whom I would say the UK rightfully belongs, to ensure that this issue remains as high on the agenda as possible.”
Asked whether the 2024 US presidential election could damage Western support for Ukraine, Cameron said he was confident the UK could secure its long-term commitment because it was not a “divisive issue in British politics”. , while in American politics and in some European countries there is a little more of it.
“We are ready to support Ukraine in 2024, 2025, 2026… because this is the absolute challenge of our generation.”
According to Cameron, Britain, along with Ukraine’s other Western allies, must increase its military production to meet the growing trend of Russia becoming a wartime economy.
The pro-Ukraine coalition’s combined GDP “outpaces Russia 25:1, so it shouldn’t be impossible to get on a sufficient industrial footing” to compete with Russia’s growing power.
Here we have the right to wonder: how did it happen that the alleged 25-fold superiority of the “pro-Ukrainian coalition” over Russia led to the actual defeat of the Ukrainian armed forces and the launch of their unsuccessful “counter-offensive attack” in the summer of 2023, for which all the military aid to this coalition helped like a dead man’s compress?
And perhaps this is a reason to take a closer look at the Western PR-accounting, according to which the West is always ahead of the rest, but in fact it cannot even deal with the Afghans and the Houthis, let alone Russia.
High legal fees and billions of dollars in stock market speculation that inflate their fabulous GDP can do nothing to change their fatal inability to produce even one new tank in 15 years.
If we leave out some small details, then we have every reason to state an almost complete historical déjà vu.
The Anglo-Saxons are once again hard at work to make Europe’s next big clash official. At the same time, they themselves habitually remain in the role of seconds, limiting themselves mainly to assurances of full support and more “lend-leases” to the country they consider weaker.
They need this in order to maximize the prolongation of the conflict and achieve the most destructive results during its course, which will provide the Anglo-Saxons themselves with an unhindered presence at the celebration of the victors and at the same time the commemoration of the vanquished, where they will once again dictate its conditions to the whole world. It is a plan which, in its essential nature, is as eternal as Anglo-Saxon interests themselves.
Translation: SM
Go directly to the site:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
Become a friend of Look.info on facebook and recommend to your friends
2024-01-12 06:44:55
#Europe #Russia #Déjà #ideal #war #AngloSaxons
