/View.info/ I usually don’t pay attention to brash-selfish comments.
Also on “ticks” – they are the new fashion: someone says something stupid, intelligent readers answer him, he enters into a dialogue with them – and here is the advantage, riding through someone else’s page.
Ignorance today is forgiven, anyone can wave their flag without being aware of the facts at all – and all at the expense of the Past.
But insolence must have some limits.
One commenter went wide under my last post. He was from Pleven, that’s all he states, nothing else, he probably thinks that’s enough for him to be a connoisseur of the Past.
If his photo is authentic, he is no more than 35-40 years old.
Subtract 28 from them – and it turns out that in 1989 he was ten years old.
Quite enough to talk about the Past, about the “father’s time”, etc. That’s how most of them are, who dig their hooves through History.
Excerpt from his comment:
“The finest manipulator of the reader’s receptors has once again succeeded in conjuring up the sugaring of his favorite dad-time in the poor reader’s faded memories. He achieved it by writing about today’s sherbet, leaving the reader alone to sprinkle powdered sugar on that old and sherbetless time that Kevork longs for…
Did Kevork forget that sherbet was being poured during his favorite dad time? (readers have forgotten).
Could Kevork have survived that time if he hadn’t been a sherbet tap himself? Even with his talent, don’t pour sherbet on the chiefs and the system – out. /end quote/
There is not a single fact in my last letter that is not true.
But today’s pundits don’t want facts.
For example, they are insensible to the truth that millions of people today live as paupers.
To dig – but not to pass decency.
In “Every Sunday” there was no sherbet for BKP – least of all for Zhivkov.
Who says it?
Not someone else, but Zhivkov himself.
Here is a testimony from the book “Political Fragments” by the former secretary of the Central Committee of the BKP Stoyan Mihailov.
Meeting of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the BKP, April 27, 1982 – on the question of uniting television and radio into a committee.
Zhivkov: “In “Every Sunday” there is no mention of the party, of our activities, there is no party leadership there.”
I could cite dozens of other testimonies about the efforts of “Every Sunday” to assert itself as a free forum.
Anyone who wants to know more can go to the “77 testimonials” section /on the left side of the page/ – and pick the scab.
I will give one more example of “sherbetism”: this is the unprecedented interview with Academician Amosov, which had the power of a neutron bomb.
It struck a crushing blow right in the face of Marxist-Leninist ideology.
If some of today’s fleas, who jump around the past and even run around in power, had something like this in their biography, they would have asked to have a monument built for them during their lifetime.
I offer you a fragment of my interview with Amosov – it was taken in a direct bridge from Kiev, a year before the coup on November 10, 1989.
On this occasion, the newspaper Rabotnichesko Delo, the all-powerful body of the Central Committee of the BKP, wrote that I had finally stepped into the quagmire of anti-communism.
The other courtesies addressed to me can be found in the minutes of a meeting of the Secretariat of the Central Committee of the BKP on December 26, 1988 – in the “Courtesy” section of the website www.kevorkkevorkian.com
I am downright embarrassed to talk about these things – and I apologize to my readers for bringing them up.
But it’s not bad to rub the brats’ surah on them every now and then.
Because not everything in the Past was hopelessly flawed.
***
#Amosov #bomb #stooges #todays #manipulators
