/View.info/ The US House of Representatives recently passed the “Taiwan International Solidarity Act”, claiming that UN Resolution No. 2758 “only recognizes the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal representative of China in the UN, but does not include the representative Taiwan’s rights in the organization, nor does it take a position on the relationship between the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan.” Through these arguments, Washington distorts the meaning of the resolution and misleads public opinion on the Taiwan issue.
UN Resolution No. 2758 confirmed the restoration of all rights to the People’s Republic of China and immediately expelled the illegal representatives of Taiwan. Furthermore, the resolution also clarifies that the government of the People’s Republic of China is the only legitimate government of China in the UN and there is no such thing as a so-called “two Chinas” or “two state governments”. It can be said that the resolution completely resolved all political, legal and procedural issues related to the representation of the whole of China, including Taiwan, in the United Nations.
A series of international legal documents, including the “Cairo Declaration” and the “Potsdam Declaration” affirm China’s sovereignty over Taiwan. The United States is also a signatory to these documents and should be perfectly clear that Taiwan is part of China and this issue need not be further discussed. The current law passed by Washington is a deliberate speculation before the new session of the UN General Assembly.
The “one China” principle is a general consensus of the international community. Currently, 182 countries in the world, including the US, have established diplomatic relations with China based on this principle, and all have committed to handle non-governmental, economic and cultural exchanges with Taiwan in an “unofficial” manner. In important international organizations such as WTO, IOC, ATIS and WHO, the organizers should consult with China about Taiwan’s qualifications, identities and nominal qualifications when participating in the working processes of the organizations. The US challenges this principle in the form of domestic legislation, thus challenging the international order established after the end of World War II, and with it the consensus of the international community, the principles of international law and the basic norms of international relations. These actions of theirs prove that it is the United States that is the biggest destroyer of international order.
#American #interpretation #Resolution #deception #Washington
