[The Epoch Times December 12, 2020](Reported by The Epoch Times reporter Zachary Stieber / Compiled by Zhang Yujie)TexasTo the U.S. a few days agoSupreme CourtProsecute 4Swing stateLater, on December 11, it submitted the supporting motion documents to the Supreme Court.The document stated that the 4 defendant states had never dealt with TexaslitigationOn the contrary, they attempted to evade and cover up the serious problems mentioned in.
TexasTo the United States on the evening of December 7Supreme CourtMentionlitigation, Accusing Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan of violating the constitution to amend election regulations, treat voters unequally, and relax safeguards on election integrity, thus triggering large-scale election violations.
The lawsuit alleges these fourSwing stateViolating the regulations of the legislature, and thus violated the US Constitution.
The four defendant states filed their defenses with the Supreme Court on December 10, requesting the Supreme Court to dismiss the Texas lawsuit. The Attorney General of Pennsylvania claimed that Texas had violated the principles of constitutional democracy; Wisconsin claimed that Texas could not accuse Wisconsin’s actions of directly harming Texas interests.
In Texas’s latest reply on December 11 (click here to view), the Texas Attorney General and other state prosecutors stated that, instead of taking seriously the serious election issues raised by Texas, the four defendant states attempted to use court decisions that Texas could not participate in to cover up and misinterpret the legal protection that Texas is seeking. And its legitimate reasons.
They stated that (the Supreme Court) should issue an injunction because the defendant state did not and could not defend its actions.
Texas did not seek re-elections in its suit before the Supreme Court, nor did it seek to abolish voter voting.
“Texas requires the Supreme Court to find the following obvious facts-the defendant state’s malfeasance in the 2020 general election has made it impossible for the public to know which candidate won the majority of the legal votes.” It is equivalent to depriving voters of the right to vote. The (Supreme Court) should take immediate action to require the lower courts and the states and their officials to abide by state election laws in future elections. Any changes to the election laws before the general election are It must be approved by the legislature.”
The Texas lawsuit triggered a response from the attorneys general of 39 states, of which 18 states supported Texas and 20 states supported the defendant state.
In addition, Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation, and The Presidential Coalition filed a motion on December 11, requesting permission to file a defense in support of Texas. The three groups said that Texas was damaged and should seek protection and compensation.
Editor in charge: Li Yuan#
– .
