The Texas government announced a major reinforcement of the barrier that floats on the waters of the Rio Grande and extended the barbed wire network in the Eagle Pass corridor as a way to deter the crossing of migrants from Mexico, reported Governor Greg Abbott .
The measure was implemented in search of a significant reduction in border crossings before President-elect Donald Trump returns to the White House.
This month it was reported that Trump will mobilize agencies across the US government to help him deport a record number of migrants, building on his first term’s efforts to take advantage of all available resources.
The buoys were placed near Bridge 1, an area that divides Piedras Negras, Coahuila, from Eagle Pass, one of the places where a very high migratory flow is recorded. The action is part of the operation Lone Star, promoted by Abbott since March 2021 to “respond to the increase in irregular migration.”
According to data presented by the governor’s office, irregular crossings into Texas decreased by 86 percent since said operation was implemented. These actions have led to more than 526 thousand arrests of irregular migrants and more than 41 thousand charges for serious crimes.
The conservative governor assured through a publication on his account that “despite the Biden administration’s efforts to eliminate these floating barriers, Texas kept them in the river,” and reaffirmed his intentions to continue the expansion.
President Joe Biden sued Texas to eliminate the floating wall, which began to be deployed in 2023, because it was carried out without federal authorization, in addition to representing humanitarian and environmental concerns, but in July of that same year, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the barrier could remain afloat.
Abbott also highlighted that the migrant transportation program implemented by Texas reduced the number of crossings into the state and, therefore, the number of people sent to sanctuary cities. “Fewer illegal crossings mean fewer migrants to transport,” he concluded.
With information from Reuters
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘
fbq(‘init’, ‘133913093805922’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Contact’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Donate’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘FindLocation’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Lead’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Search’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Subscribe’, {value: ‘0.00’, currency: ‘MXN’, predicted_ltv: ‘0.00’});
fbq(‘track’, ‘ViewContent’);
#Texas #reinforces #buoy #barrier #Rio #Bravo
–
**How effective is the buoy barrier, in comparison to other border enforcement tactics, and what specific data points should be used to evaluate its success or failure?**
## World Today News Interview: Texas Border Enforcement
**Introduction:**
Welcome to World Today News. Today we’re discussing the controversial reinforcement of the Rio Grande buoy barrier by Texas Governor Greg Abbott. Joining me are two experts with differing perspectives on this issue:
* **Dr. Maria Hernandez**, a human rights lawyer specializing in immigration law, and;
* **Mr. John Smith**, a former Border Patrol agent and current security analyst.
**Section 1: Deterrence and Effectiveness**
* **Host:** Governor Abbott claims the buoy barrier has significantly reduced border crossings. Dr. Hernandez, what is your assessment of the barrier’s effectiveness as a deterrent? Do you believe it is a humane and effective strategy?
* **Dr. Hernandez:** *(Responds with perspective on effectiveness and humanitarian concerns)*
* **Host:** Mr. Smith, your expertise lies in border security. Do you agree with the Governor’s assessment? What are your thoughts on the long-term success of this type of barrier?
* **Mr. Smith:** *(Responds with perspective on effectiveness and security concerns)*
**Section 2: Legal and Environmental Implications**
* **Host:** The Biden administration challenged the legality of the barrier. Dr. Hernandez, what are the key legal arguments opposing the buoy barrier?
* **Dr. Hernandez:** *(Elaborates on legal challenges and environmental concerns)*
* **Host:** Mr. Smith, what are the counterarguments to these legal challenges? Do you believe the federal government should have a greater role in border security measures like this?
* **Mr. Smith:** *(Responds with counterarguments and perspective on federal-state relations)*
**Section 3: Humanitarian Concerns and Migrant Well-being**
* **Host:** The article mentions arrest numbers and charges for serious crimes. Dr. Hernandez, what are the potential humanitarian consequences of these enforcement measures?
* **Dr. Hernandez:** *(Discusses potential negative impact on migrants and refugee rights)*
* **Host:** Mr. Smith, how would you balance border security with ensuring the humane treatment of migrants?
* **Mr. Smith:** *(Offers perspective on balancing security with humanitarian considerations)*
**Section 4: Looking Ahead**
* **Host:** With the upcoming presidential election, how do you foresee the future of border security policies in Texas and the United States?
* **Dr. Hernandez:** *(Offers predictions and possibilities for future policies)*
* **Mr. Smith:** *(Provides his perspective on the future of border security based on political climate)*
**Conclusion:**
Thank you, Dr. Hernandez and Mr. Smith, for sharing your valuable insights on this complex and important issue. This discussion highlights the difficult balance between border security and humanitarian concerns, a debate likely to continue in the coming months and years. We encourage our viewers to stay informed and engage in respectful dialogue on this critical topic.
