Texas Jury Rules in Civil Case Involving Pro-Trump Activists and Biden Campaign Bus Incident
A Texas jury has reached a verdict in a civil trial stemming from a 2020 incident where a group of pro-Trump activists surrounded a campaign bus for then-candidate Joe Biden on the highway. While five of the activists were cleared of any wrongdoing, one individual, Eliazar Cisneros, was found liable and ordered to pay damages for his role in the event.
Background of the Incident
In a trial lasting two weeks, the jury found that Cisneros conspired to intimidate the Biden campaign and disrupt its activities, awarding him a penalty of $40,000. The other defendants, Stephen and Randi Ceh, Joeylynn and Robert Mesaros, and Dolores Park, were acquitted of any charges.
Legal Implications of the Ruling
Co-counsel John Paredes reflected on the trial’s significance, noting its relevance in the current political landscape. Paredes stated, “This ruling sends a strong signal that acts of political intimidation or violence will not go unpunished in future electoral processes.”
Statements from Defendants
In a statement following the verdict, Randi Mesaros expressed the personal toll the trial has taken on the defendants, describing the experience as feeling “like zoo animals in the cage” and expressing a desire to be regarded as normal citizens once again.
Details of the High-profile Incident
The incident in question took place nearly four years ago when a convoy of cars, part of a “Trump train,” surrounded Biden’s bus on Interstate 35. Witnesses and footage from the event depict a chaotic situation as drivers swarmed the bus, creating a highly disruptive scenario. The bus’s driver, Timothy Holloway, had to take evasive action to escape
Impact on Biden’s Campaign
Following the encounter, the Biden campaign had to cancel several events in the area, which were impacted by the disruptions caused by the group of Trump supporters. Trump, at the time, publicly praised the actions of the convoy, showcasing the incident’s immediate political ramifications.
Application of Ku Klux Klan Act
The lawsuit made reference to various Texas laws regarding civil assault and civil conspiracy, as well as invoking the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. This particular statute, which aims to shield against political violence and intimidation, had not been actively employed in recent legal battles until now, marking a significant development in its application.
Responses and Future Proceedings
Despite the jury’s decision, Cisneros’ attorney has announced plans to contest the ruling through an appeal. The legal saga has also seen two of the original co-defendants settle the case last year and issue public apologies.
Additionally, the city of San Marcos has resolved its own legal troubles, paying out $175,000 to the plaintiffs for allegations relating to inadequate police response during the 2020 event.
