Orbán Viktor’s Statements on Slovakia Criticized by Slovak Politicians
Slovak politician Andrej Danko believes that Hungarian Prime Minister Orbán Viktor has gone too far with his statements about separatist Slovakia, according to the Magyar Nemzet. Danko stated that he believes these statements were made on an emotional basis, although he did not expect such behavior from an experienced politician. He also expressed his conviction that Slovakia, like Hungary, should implement reforms, but the borders are sacred and unchangeable for them.
Richard Sulík, the leader of the Freedom and Solidarity (SASKA) party, finds it unacceptable that the Hungarian Prime Minister questions the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Slovak Republic in any way. Sulík criticized Orbán for questioning the legitimacy of the neighboring country, stating that such rhetoric does not belong in the vocabulary of 21st-century politicians. He also condemned the politicians for spreading hatred between Slovaks and Hungarians and damaging the good neighborly relations.
The centrist Christian Democratic Movement (KDH) considers Orbán Viktor’s statements absurd. Milan Majersky, the leader of the movement, believes that the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy dissolved in 1918, and Slovakia did not separate from that state. The leader of KDH finds any form of questioning the borders unacceptable and potentially tragic.
The full article can be read [here](https://magyarnemzet.hu/kulfold/2023/07/egyre-hevesebben-biraljak-szlovakiaban-a-magyar-miniszterelnokot).
What concerns do Slovak politicians express about Orbán’s questioning of Slovakia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity
Slovak Politicians Slam Orbán Viktor’s Controversial Comments on Slovakia
Hungarian Prime Minister Orbán Viktor is facing sharp criticism from Slovak politicians over his recent remarks about a potentially separatist Slovakia. Andrej Danko, a prominent Slovak politician, expressed his disappointment, stating that he believed Orbán’s statements were driven by emotion rather than reason. Given Orbán’s experience in politics, Danko expected a more measured approach from the Hungarian leader. Despite calling for reforms in Slovakia and Hungary, Danko stressed that the country’s borders should remain sacred and inviolable.
Richard Sulík, the leader of the Freedom and Solidarity (SASKA) party, goes even further, deeming Orbán’s questioning of Slovakia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity completely unacceptable. Sulík firmly condemned Orbán’s tactics, arguing that such rhetoric has no place in the vocabulary of 21st-century politicians. He also expressed concern about the damage caused by politicians who foster animosity between Slovaks and Hungarians, thus undermining the positive relations between their countries.
The Christian Democratic Movement (KDH), a centrist Slovak party, joins the chorus of criticism, labeling Orbán Viktor’s statements as absurd. Milan Majersky, the party’s leader, stressed that Slovakia did not separate from the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy in 1918, refuting the basis of Orbán’s claims. Majersky firmly believes that any form of questioning the country’s borders is intolerable and potentially dangerous.
The controversy surrounding Orbán Viktor’s statements continues to dominate the political landscape, revealing the deep divisions and concerns within Slovakia. As these criticisms gain momentum, it remains to be seen how Orbán will address and respond to these reproaches from his Slovak counterparts.
Read the full article [here](https://magyarnemzet.hu/kulfold/2023/07/egyre-hevesebben-biraljak-szlovakiaban-a-magyar-miniszterelnokot).
